<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid Blogging and the Art of Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/</link>
	<description>The Human Side of Media and the Social Side of Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:36:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I need your help, what blogger ethics and transparency questions do you have for</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-39039</link>
		<dc:creator>I need your help, what blogger ethics and transparency questions do you have for</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-39039</guid>
		<description>[...] is quite a big thing around here, as well as many other places online. I&#8217;ve written about the topic a few times, and read/commented on other posts around the web on it as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is quite a big thing around here, as well as many other places online. I&#8217;ve written about the topic a few times, and read/commented on other posts around the web on it as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discussing Blogger Ethics with Joe Hackman &#124; Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-39000</link>
		<dc:creator>Discussing Blogger Ethics with Joe Hackman &#124; Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-39000</guid>
		<description>[...] is quite a big thing around here, as well as many other places online. I&#8217;ve written about it a few times, and read/commented on other posts around the web on it as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is quite a big thing around here, as well as many other places online. I&#8217;ve written about it a few times, and read/commented on other posts around the web on it as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Business Tutorials - WebProBusiness.com &#187; Can Business Trust Be Lost By Huge Marketing Budgets?</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Business Tutorials - WebProBusiness.com &#187; Can Business Trust Be Lost By Huge Marketing Budgets?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>[...] paid blogging and sponsored tweets make more headway and come under both praise and criticism, it’s clear that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] paid blogging and sponsored tweets make more headway and come under both praise and criticism, it’s clear that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economy of Trust and Its Value in Emerging Media</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-8680</link>
		<dc:creator>The Economy of Trust and Its Value in Emerging Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-8680</guid>
		<description>[...] paid blogging and sponsored tweets make more headway and come under both praise and criticism, it&#8217;s clear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] paid blogging and sponsored tweets make more headway and come under both praise and criticism, it&#8217;s clear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthuryann</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>arthuryann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>Danny,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree: What&#039;s the problem?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The PRSA Code of Ethics is instructive in this area. In a recent &quot;practice advisory&quot; to our members (periodic updates to our code), we advised our members to disclose any exchange of value intended to garner or influence editorial coverage. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The code now stipulates that is unethical to knowingly fail to request disclosure of confidential compensation to a communication medium for placement of specified editorial content. It also encourages disclosure of any exchange of value that influences how those they represent are covered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given those disclosures, readers can assess for themselves the information’s bias, accuracy and usefulness. Seems to me that Chris Brogan got it right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arthur Yann is vice president of public relations for PRSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,</p>
<p>I agree: What&#39;s the problem?</p>
<p>The PRSA Code of Ethics is instructive in this area. In a recent &#8220;practice advisory&#8221; to our members (periodic updates to our code), we advised our members to disclose any exchange of value intended to garner or influence editorial coverage. </p>
<p>The code now stipulates that is unethical to knowingly fail to request disclosure of confidential compensation to a communication medium for placement of specified editorial content. It also encourages disclosure of any exchange of value that influences how those they represent are covered.</p>
<p>Given those disclosures, readers can assess for themselves the information’s bias, accuracy and usefulness. Seems to me that Chris Brogan got it right.</p>
<p>Arthur Yann is vice president of public relations for PRSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sponsored Tweets and IZEA - Is This Twitter's Future? &#124; danny brown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-8162</link>
		<dc:creator>Sponsored Tweets and IZEA - Is This Twitter's Future? &#124; danny brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-8162</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s a contentious topic that generally splits blogger opinion down the middle, with both sides offering valid reasons for their views for and against sponsored posts or paid blogging. Personally, I&#8217;m neither here nor there on the topic as long as it&#8217;s handled properly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s a contentious topic that generally splits blogger opinion down the middle, with both sides offering valid reasons for their views for and against sponsored posts or paid blogging. Personally, I&#8217;m neither here nor there on the topic as long as it&#8217;s handled properly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipping the Scales (or The Dark Side of Blogging versus PR) &#124; danny brown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipping the Scales (or The Dark Side of Blogging versus PR) &#124; danny brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>[...] I understand about paid blogging and I have no qualms with it, as long as the blogger is upfront that it&#8217;s a sponsored post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I understand about paid blogging and I have no qualms with it, as long as the blogger is upfront that it&#8217;s a sponsored post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucio ribeiro</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>lucio ribeiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Danny, be honest here, read your post but didn&#039;t read all comments.
Im straight forward when it comes to paid reviews, there&#039;s nothing with ethics ! Dont really get all this conversation about ethics in monetizing your blog.
It&#039;s acceptable a full webspage with adwords but not review a product/brand paying?
Juts because internet was born free doesn&#039;t mean it cant evolute, and money plays strong on this evolution.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;lucio ribeiro´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://marketingeasy.net/they-know-something-you-dont/2008-12-10/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;They Know Something You don’t&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, be honest here, read your post but didn&#8217;t read all comments.<br />
Im straight forward when it comes to paid reviews, there&#8217;s nothing with ethics ! Dont really get all this conversation about ethics in monetizing your blog.<br />
It&#8217;s acceptable a full webspage with adwords but not review a product/brand paying?<br />
Juts because internet was born free doesn&#8217;t mean it cant evolute, and money plays strong on this evolution.</p>
<p><abbr><em>lucio ribeiro´s last blog post..<a href="http://marketingeasy.net/they-know-something-you-dont/2008-12-10/" rel="nofollow">They Know Something You don’t</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-832</guid>
		<description>I understand what you mean (and I wasn&#039;t looking for vindication of any trust in me) ;-)

The question was more from the point of view of why you understand why others might have felt let down by Chris&#039;s post (if that was your meaning in the original response)?

If they&#039;ve been following him for any decent amount of time (either as a blogger or on Twitter) then I&#039;d say that they&#039;ve already trusted his voice and opinion. So why would a disclosed post that wasn&#039;t an out-and-out sales pitch cause them to lose that trust? Particularly when much of the criticism was coming from people that &quot;have known Chris for a long time&quot; even without meeting, as you mention yourself, by reading his blog for so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you mean (and I wasn&#8217;t looking for vindication of any trust in me) <img src='http://dannybrown.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The question was more from the point of view of why you understand why others might have felt let down by Chris&#8217;s post (if that was your meaning in the original response)?</p>
<p>If they&#8217;ve been following him for any decent amount of time (either as a blogger or on Twitter) then I&#8217;d say that they&#8217;ve already trusted his voice and opinion. So why would a disclosed post that wasn&#8217;t an out-and-out sales pitch cause them to lose that trust? Particularly when much of the criticism was coming from people that &#8220;have known Chris for a long time&#8221; even without meeting, as you mention yourself, by reading his blog for so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/13/paid-blogging-and-the-art-of-transparency/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=2572#comment-827</guid>
		<description>There is a chemistry that occurs between two people when meeting in person, as I&#039;ve done with Chris, when one&#039;s eyes look into another&#039;s, and explanations are unnecessary.

That&#039;s not to say I don&#039;t trust you, Danny, but I trust Chris more.

It&#039;s similar among people who&#039;ve never physically met but have known each other for a long period of time, when the truth is understood without saying anything.

Know what I mean?

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ari Herzog´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ariwriter/~3/485136184/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why Republicans Prefer Twitter Over Suicide (and Online Media Guidance for CNN)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a chemistry that occurs between two people when meeting in person, as I&#8217;ve done with Chris, when one&#8217;s eyes look into another&#8217;s, and explanations are unnecessary.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say I don&#8217;t trust you, Danny, but I trust Chris more.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar among people who&#8217;ve never physically met but have known each other for a long period of time, when the truth is understood without saying anything.</p>
<p>Know what I mean?</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ari Herzog´s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ariwriter/~3/485136184/" rel="nofollow">Why Republicans Prefer Twitter Over Suicide (and Online Media Guidance for CNN)</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

