
- Image via CrunchBase
The news that Apple CEO Steve Jobs is taking extended leave for health reasons, and the ensuing questions about how this will affect Apple in both the short-term and long-term, raises a point that many companies should look at. How expendable are your key employees?
(Before I continue, I just want to offer my sincere wishes to Steve and his family and hope that he returns to full health sooner rather than later).
It’s a question that not too many businesses look at, especially if the employee is either a founder or boardroom level. Yet it’s something that every business needs to be aware of, and not just at the highest level.
One Minus One Equals…
Look at Apple and Microsoft for a minute. Everyone knows who the number one employee is (or was) – Steve Jobs and Bill Gates respectively. They’ve become the face of their companies and are synonymous with the two brands.
Yet for anyone outside the tech and associated arenas, could you say who’s immediately after these guys? Timothy D. Cook is the Chief Operating Officer for Apple and Steve Ballmer is the CEO of Microsoft. I know of Ballmer, but that’s purely from being an Xbox 360 owner and his name pops up a lot in that field, but Cook I didn’t know.
This is why there’s been such a reaction to the news about Steve Jobs’ health – most people (or at least the ones that really matter, the consumers) see Jobs as Apple and vice versa. All of Apple’s successes have been because of Jobs (again, in the eyes of the general consumer), so no Jobs means no Apple.
You only have to look at the way Apple’s share price dropped when a citizen journalist incorrectly reported on Jobs’ death. While the story was criticized for lack of research, it did raise a valuable point – is being the face of a company detrimental to your overall business strategy?
Strength in Numbers
There are two key factors in the success of a business – customers and product. Sure, you can have the best personnel but without customers it doesn’t matter if you have the most kick-ass team in business history. While market forces and economy also play a part, it’s customers and product that go hand-in-hand with each other that either make or break a business.
Normally they won’t care who’s running a company – all that matters is they can get a product they need at the price they want to pay. However, if they see a front person for that company, it’s natural to associate that person as the company itself. So if something happens to that person, it’s also natural to think the company will be affected. Which is what’s happening with Apple now, despite the fact they have a tremendous backroom team in place to steady the ship.
If you have a face to your business, ask yourself if it’s the best approach. It’s always good to be recognizable as a brand but can there be too much recognition?
- Make your business the brand as opposed to having a figurehead. These are usually only good for shareholders and investors, and they don’t normally stick around too long when your customer base starts disappearing.
- Spread the love. Businesses with just one or two key personnel are always at risk from one or both of them leaving. Where does that leave the business? Encourage others to step up and reward innovation across the company with increased responsibilities.
- Talk to your customers. Keep them up-to-date with current events behind-the-scenes ahead of announcements and help head off speculation before it happens.
- Build their confidence that your business isn’t just a one-man show. If there are public trade shows, send multiple employees to deliver keynote speeches in their niche. A ship full of knowledge is more powerful than a knowledgeable ship.
No-one likes to hand the reins of their baby over to anyone else. You built the business; you made the early sacrifices; so you should be the one leading from the front, right?
Yes, you should be leading. But do your customers really care who’s leading as long as your business meets their needs?
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment and subscribe to my RSS feed or via email to ensure you can enjoy the latest post(s)
Enjoy this post? You might also like:
More from across the web:
- How Not To Use Social Media (The Arkayne Blog)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=680d6d64-d628-4813-ae53-0c3db8535ed3)











The current health scare surrounding Apple CEO Steve Jobs has seen countless speculation about the future of Apple itself. What can this teach us about business figureheads?
via uberVU
The current health scare surrounding Apple CEO Steve Jobs has seen countless speculation about the future of Apple itself. What can this teach us about business figureheads?
via uberVU
The current health scare surrounding Apple CEO Steve Jobs has seen countless speculation about the future of Apple itself. What can this teach us about business figureheads?
via uberVU
Twitter: mschechter
This is a very serious risk in our industry (jewelry). Think about it, David Yurman, John Hardy, Judith Ripka, Scott Kay and so on. I come from a world where often times it takes putting a designer out in front, but this gives your company a real shelf life. This is why brands like Tiffany, Cartier and the like can build a rich history over a long span of time.
With regard to leadership, a solid company usually has one or two true leaders, but good leaders make sure to give the brand an identity of its own. I often see Shel Israel talking about putting a face in front of the brand, but I could not disagree more. Far more important to show that the brand as a whole can have a heart, soul and meaningful story.
I am sure someone will emerge to take Job's place, he set the bar extremely high for Apple and hopefully someone will rise to it.
That's a great outlook, Michael – "show the brand as a whole can have a heart, soul and meaningful story".
I think that's what people really connect to – the human touch. Greedy corporations have tested the patience of too many people to the limits – we want to connect with genuine businesses now.
Make the brand one that people respect, trust and value and there's no need for any figureheads – or if there is, they'll be received better and still have a brand as their backing.
I completely agree with your point on the importance of branding. Possibly an even better approach would be the bottom-up management (leaderless organization).
On the other hand, there are two possible upsides I can see for a figurehead:
1- Speed: much faster than building a brand if your figurehead is the right person, as humans easily associate themselves with other people.
2- Insurance: It's much easier to turn things around with a figurehead when things are going downhill. Again, with a figurehead it might be easier to direct people's opinion.
So maybe the optimal lies somewhere in between?
Twitter: mschechter
While I am a fan of bottom up initiative, I am not sure I believe in bottom up leadership. Leadership and vision are essential to breathing life into a company. We utilize our CEO as a spokesperson for our QVC line and it has allowed our customers to really connect. That being said, he is there serving the company and not his own image. He has a clear passion for the company and our product and customers can feel that. At the end of the day it is all about where you put the focus. Is the spotlight on the product or the person.
Jobs and Apple is interesting. I keep going back and forth between the idea that Jobs kept the light on himself for far too long or that there was just no one at Apple that had the potential to own that stage. I really hope they find someone to represent the brand as he has for so many years. Let's be honest (and Danny said this) Microsoft has been facing the same issues for quite some time.