I missed all the commotion on the original article but found this one and went back to read it all over. I have to commend you for outing the people behind that site. The world would be a better place if more people stood up for something they think is wrong, rather than just turning away and leaving it for the next guy.

As far as the comments go, all you can do is laugh it off and greet it with a smile, just like you did. It really can’t be taken personally when all the negativity is left by anonymous people with fake names that don’t link to their own sites. The same people who wanted to use a fake site like that hid behind fake names rather than standing up for something like you did in the article.

Well done. Keep it coming!

Marty

Clearly these people are not the type to consider the greater impact their actions may have on others. Or perhaps they are, and that’s why they took it upon themselves to inform you and your readers to lighten up. In either case, taking into account what they were so steadfastly defending speaks volumes of their character in my opinion, which was only further established by the immaturity of many of their comments. Obviously this does not apply to all of them, as there were some who put more thought into their words.

You handled the situation very well, despite how easy it could have been to respond to the less thought-out comments. The fact that you are finding a positive in their community spirit from all of this speaks volumes of your character.

While some topics lend themselves to passionate prose, most people would be better served by carrying on an intelligent conversation instead of an endless diatribe of ranting. And when that ranting becomes abusive, the beauty of running your own blog is that such nonsense can be tamed.

Funnily enough, Brave New World was one of my favourite books during my English degree – Huxley is an extremely underrated author.

Have a good one!

Cheers. I don’t think it would have furthered any discussion had I responded (except to the comments that needed one). Better left to let emotions and responses have an open forum and move on.

Cheers again guys – and yes, the community aspect was nice to see.

It is a shame that people are so fast to criticize and so slow to praise. And all the people out there who are so angered by your appearance, well we don’t know what they look like as not one of them left an avatar. (Wouldn’t it be great if we all dressed by rank and file like something out of Brave New World!)

Keep up the good work Danny, lets hope this community of pranksters develops a sense of proportion to go with its sense of humour(?) someday soon.

As Andrew said, this showed throughout the entire time as you engaged those attacking in a non-offensive and understanding way.

No, I didn’t agree with the way the supporters were attacking you nor did I agree with their overall opinions. But was there a sense of community there? Definitely.

Thanks for again opening my eyes

That was the key point reason for the post in the first place. Instead of being a bit of fun, there were very real issues that could have arisen from misuse. And once that happens, it can spread very quickly – as you point out with both Amazon and Domino’s.

The information I offered was freely available – if I had gotten hold of private information and posted it, then I agree, I would have crossed several ethical and legal boundaries.

Perhaps there’s a market for something like Fake-Twitter, but with the way information and misinformation spreads so quickly, how would you control the reach of it? Perhaps if it was in a closed space? Who knows? And how would you guarantee it was enclosed?

Branding is an expensive matter – sometimes parody isn’t the right approach.

Thanks for stopping by and sharing your view, appreciate it.