<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Social Media Needs the FTC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/</link>
	<description>Conversations in social media for marketing, PR, communications and community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:49:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Media, Honesty and the FTC Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media, Honesty and the FTC Guidelines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>[...] been a lot said about them on both sides of the fence, with plenty bloggers offering their views for and against. Some say it will inhibit free speech, while others applaud the FTC for getting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a lot said about them on both sides of the fence, with plenty bloggers offering their views for and against. Some say it will inhibit free speech, while others applaud the FTC for getting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economy of Trust and Its Value in Emerging Media</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-8665</link>
		<dc:creator>The Economy of Trust and Its Value in Emerging Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-8665</guid>
		<description>[...] in the fact that the FTC is currently looking at how it can monitor sponsored reviews and advertising online, and it&#8217;s clear that trust and trusting have never been more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the fact that the FTC is currently looking at how it can monitor sponsored reviews and advertising online, and it&#8217;s clear that trust and trusting have never been more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arikhanson</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-10908</link>
		<dc:creator>arikhanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-10908</guid>
		<description>@dimepr You talking about this post by @dannybrown? http://bit.ly/oJcJM #journchat&lt;p class=&quot;ubervu_reaction_link&quot;&gt;via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubervu.com/conversations/dannybrown.me%2F2009%2F04%2F22%2Fwhy-social-media-needs-the-ftc%2F&quot;&gt;uberVU&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dimepr You talking about this post by @dannybrown? <a href="http://bit.ly/oJcJM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/oJcJM</a> #journchat
<p class="ubervu_reaction_link">via <a href="http://www.ubervu.com/conversations/dannybrown.me%2F2009%2F04%2F22%2Fwhy-social-media-needs-the-ftc%2F">uberVU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A Woods</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5560</link>
		<dc:creator>James A Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5560</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a problem with the FTC regulations. These laws already exist, and the new rules make it clear that the existing laws apply to social media.

It is illegal for a marketer to lie in the United States in order to con someone out of their money. It&#039;s called fraud. (In many states, it&#039;s illegal to lie for any purpose.) Honest individuals and companies have no reason for concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a problem with the FTC regulations. These laws already exist, and the new rules make it clear that the existing laws apply to social media.</p>
<p>It is illegal for a marketer to lie in the United States in order to con someone out of their money. It&#8217;s called fraud. (In many states, it&#8217;s illegal to lie for any purpose.) Honest individuals and companies have no reason for concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newsletter Group</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsletter Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>Good points Anna! No doubt that many people fell as you do. Consider this: Anyone (those in power) who don&#039;t  like your &quot;personal&quot; views can  target and prosecute you with &quot;the full force of law&quot; because you made an &quot;inaccurate claim&quot; appearing in a Twitter blog. Sometimes we need to socially catch up to technology organically. The world is not a friendly place for &quot;poor&quot; folk who can&#039;t afford a good attorney. Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Anna! No doubt that many people fell as you do. Consider this: Anyone (those in power) who don&#8217;t  like your &#8220;personal&#8221; views can  target and prosecute you with &#8220;the full force of law&#8221; because you made an &#8220;inaccurate claim&#8221; appearing in a Twitter blog. Sometimes we need to socially catch up to technology organically. The world is not a friendly place for &#8220;poor&#8221; folk who can&#8217;t afford a good attorney. Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>Hi Danny- great post as usual.

It raises the question to me regarding &quot;who is really qualified to Blog&quot; as anyone can start writing about anything these days. PR pros and journalists are trained to research content and cross check facts (before ading political views ;-)  ) whereas the neo-Blogger can blurt, rant or repost anything anywhere.

In an exponentially growing Blogosphere, I would agree that guidelines, checks and balances would be a much needed platform.

Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Danny- great post as usual.</p>
<p>It raises the question to me regarding &#8220;who is really qualified to Blog&#8221; as anyone can start writing about anything these days. PR pros and journalists are trained to research content and cross check facts (before ading political views <img src='http://dannybrown.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   ) whereas the neo-Blogger can blurt, rant or repost anything anywhere.</p>
<p>In an exponentially growing Blogosphere, I would agree that guidelines, checks and balances would be a much needed platform.</p>
<p>Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5356</guid>
		<description>If both of you click the link I included to Paul Chaney&#039;s blog, you&#039;ll see he already suggested what both of you are suggesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If both of you click the link I included to Paul Chaney&#8217;s blog, you&#8217;ll see he already suggested what both of you are suggesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Barcelos</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5354</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Barcelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5354</guid>
		<description>I LOVE Omar&#039;s idea! If something like this doesn&#039;t happen proactively, we may be subject to those who know less about the blog world!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE Omar&#8217;s idea! If something like this doesn&#8217;t happen proactively, we may be subject to those who know less about the blog world!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Amer</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Amer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>danny, ari - I think we need to form a group of content experts and form some guidelines &quot;from the inside,&quot; and push/package it towards the relevant legislators &amp; FTC.

this ongoing dialogue is a great starting point.  I&#039;m interested in being involved.

twitter.com/18percentgrey

-Omar

&quot;be the change you want to see in the world.&quot; - Ghandi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>danny, ari &#8211; I think we need to form a group of content experts and form some guidelines &#8220;from the inside,&#8221; and push/package it towards the relevant legislators &amp; FTC.</p>
<p>this ongoing dialogue is a great starting point.  I&#8217;m interested in being involved.</p>
<p>twitter.com/18percentgrey</p>
<p>-Omar</p>
<p>&#8220;be the change you want to see in the world.&#8221; &#8211; Ghandi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/04/22/why-social-media-needs-the-ftc/#comment-5346</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=5468#comment-5346</guid>
		<description>I see what you&#039;re saying, Ari, and as I mentioned in my response to JuneM, this is where perhaps an international body is needed? The web has reduced international boundaries anyway (with exception of state-controlled online use in certain countries), so let&#039;s make it easier to manage.

I&#039;m not saying this would be easy, but I do feel that the teething pains and initial slog would be worth it in the long run.

With regards your point about the FTC blogging (or not) - I don&#039;t think that&#039;s as big an issue. After all, it&#039;s not the blogs that they would be going after &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt; - it&#039;s false advertising, and that doesn&#039;t need an updated FTC blog to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you&#8217;re saying, Ari, and as I mentioned in my response to JuneM, this is where perhaps an international body is needed? The web has reduced international boundaries anyway (with exception of state-controlled online use in certain countries), so let&#8217;s make it easier to manage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying this would be easy, but I do feel that the teething pains and initial slog would be worth it in the long run.</p>
<p>With regards your point about the FTC blogging (or not) &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s as big an issue. After all, it&#8217;s not the blogs that they would be going after <i>per se</i> &#8211; it&#8217;s false advertising, and that doesn&#8217;t need an updated FTC blog to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
