<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Do a Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t Do a Google &#124; Danny Brown &#124; Online Marketing Connect</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9947</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t Do a Google &#124; Danny Brown &#124; Online Marketing Connect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9947</guid>
		<description>[...] dannybrown for danny brown, 2009. &#124; Permalink &#124;  Post tags: crazy ideas, google, google sidewiki 8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dannybrown for danny brown, 2009. | Permalink |  Post tags: crazy ideas, google, google sidewiki 8 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tessacarroll</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9926</link>
		<dc:creator>tessacarroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9926</guid>
		<description>Initially, I&#039;m inclined to agree with you Danny.  However, Jason makes a really good point.  You could look at it as genius or insane.  Either way, there&#039;s a fine line.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess what it comes down to is this, we have no way of knowing what Google was thinking.  Until we do, we can&#039;t really pass judgment on their decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tessa Carroll&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogs.vbpoutsourcing.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.blogs.vbpoutsourcing.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially, I&#39;m inclined to agree with you Danny.  However, Jason makes a really good point.  You could look at it as genius or insane.  Either way, there&#39;s a fine line.  </p>
<p>I guess what it comes down to is this, we have no way of knowing what Google was thinking.  Until we do, we can&#39;t really pass judgment on their decision.</p>
<p>Tessa Carroll<br /><a href="http://www.blogs.vbpoutsourcing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogs.vbpoutsourcing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9907</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9907</guid>
		<description>Strange, isn&#039;t it? They have some of the best and most user-friendly products around, yet they seem to hinder more than most when some simple forward planning might have helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, isn&#39;t it? They have some of the best and most user-friendly products around, yet they seem to hinder more than most when some simple forward planning might have helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Favreau</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Favreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9906</guid>
		<description>That is crazy.  It is almost like they are admitting their search engine is bad and no one is using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is crazy.  It is almost like they are admitting their search engine is bad and no one is using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aflyonthewall</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9905</link>
		<dc:creator>aflyonthewall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9905</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Danny and this isn&#039;t the first example - I love Chrome and have been using it exclusively - and it is just now to a point where it&#039;s Blogger interface is as good as Blogger through IE/FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Danny and this isn&#39;t the first example &#8211; I love Chrome and have been using it exclusively &#8211; and it is just now to a point where it&#39;s Blogger interface is as good as Blogger through IE/FF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9904</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9904</guid>
		<description>one word&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;duh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;amazing slip up in my book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one word</p>
<p>duh.</p>
<p>amazing slip up in my book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Markow</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Markow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9902</guid>
		<description>If that were the case I would agree with you more.  However, in this example Google sidewiki IS a free service.  It is not that I am struggling with the concept, just with the term &quot;doing a google&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that were the case I would agree with you more.  However, in this example Google sidewiki IS a free service.  It is not that I am struggling with the concept, just with the term &#8220;doing a google&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9901</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9901</guid>
		<description>I agree that it could definitely be looked at that way, Jason. But let&#039;s say (for a moment) that it&#039;s a paid service and the money goes to the provider - a bit like cable. Do you think Google would have been so quick to release to what are essentially competitors, or held off and made sure they were making it for their business model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it could definitely be looked at that way, Jason. But let&#39;s say (for a moment) that it&#39;s a paid service and the money goes to the provider &#8211; a bit like cable. Do you think Google would have been so quick to release to what are essentially competitors, or held off and made sure they were making it for their business model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Markow</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2009/11/05/dont-do-a-google/#comment-9900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Markow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=8786#comment-9900</guid>
		<description>I understand where you are coming from, but couldn&#039;t one also see that and think &quot;Wow, Google has a product ready for FF and IE and instead of withholding it from people who could use until they finish tying up a few loose ends on their own platform, they decide to release it.&quot;  I guess what I am trying to say is I don&#039;t think it portrays such a negative message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand where you are coming from, but couldn&#39;t one also see that and think &#8220;Wow, Google has a product ready for FF and IE and instead of withholding it from people who could use until they finish tying up a few loose ends on their own platform, they decide to release it.&#8221;  I guess what I am trying to say is I don&#39;t think it portrays such a negative message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

