Is Blogging Dead? Yep, That Old Chestnut Again
Almost as regular as Tila Tequila’s shameless self-promotion efforts, the question of blogging being dead keeps springing up. I’ve spoken about it before (my take – most definitely not dead) as have many others.
One of the best posts I’ve read about it, though, is by Grant Griffiths, where he takes “Steve Rubel and his cronies” to task about claims that are often contradictory.
It’s a great read, and the comments add some excellent insights. Check it out now, and be sure to leave your views in the comments too.
16 Responses to “Is Blogging Dead? Yep, That Old Chestnut Again”
Thanks Akash, glad you enjoyed Grant’s post. Always happy to share great discussions and points of view, and Grant’s blog is definitely up there in both categories.
There is a popular saying you should have heeded here: If you have nothing to blog about, don’t blog.
This is silly. If blogging is dead, then why do all these people have blogs?
.-= Ari Herzog´s most recent blog post …Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion: How Credit Reporting Agencies Use Social Media =-.I don’t agree, Ari. I’m sharing Grant’s blog post with the readers of this blog, who may not be connected with me (or even on) Twitter, or Facebook, and would therefore miss the potential of reading a great post.
RE. your second point, I agree – always ironic that the blogging is dead posts are usually made on a blog platform of some kind.
If people are reading your blog, they’d disagree blogging is dead and would thus learn nothing with Grant’s post.
Again, disagree Ari. You’re saying that blog readers know all they need to know from one post or point of view?
Whose to say that every reader of this post knew about Steve’s video? Or the Wired feature? Or the PostRank stats? Or exactly why Grant feels so strongly about it?
Assuming the point of view of others achieves nothing but reduced learning.
We seem to have a disconnect so let me restate my opinion:
If someone is subscribed to your blog, whether by RSS or email delivery, then it is fair to presume he or she is knowledgeable enough about blogs to know to subscribe and not to merely bookmark your website in a browser.
If agreed, then wouldn’t you also agree that said subscriber — who may be reading this back-and-forth debate between you and me right now — knows what a blog is, grasps its value, and wouldn’t be swayed by opinions that blogging is dead?
Again, assumption is often simply another word for ignoring an interest in other views.
As I just replied to you over on Grant’s post, I’ll echo here with a link to http://ariwriter.com/why-blogging-is-not-dying/ which I wrote 14 months ago that is in direct parallel to both of your thoughts.
If I didn’t have an interest in replying to you here, or replying to Grant there, then you would be correct in your assumption.
Danny,
I think we agree that “anything dead” is equal to “anything linkbait” anymore.
I was reading a study today regarding moms and marketing, and it clearly shows that more than 50 percent read blogs regularly (and this number is trending up). Of course, there is also an increasing number of people who cannot distinguish a blog from a Web site or news site.
My intern even demonstrated her uncertainly the other day. She said she believed one story over another because one was on a blog and other was on a news site. As it turned out, they were both blogs, with the one she dismissed authored by a respected journalist.
All my best,
RichIt’s a good point, Rich. There’s such a crossover at the minute between what defines a blog and website that a lot of folks think it’s simply a website. In that respect, then yes, blogging would appear dead.
But you’re right – it’s anything but, and I’m often of the same mind as you that a lot of it is down to linkbait. Hey ho
Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website
<a href=”http://placementargent.org”>Placement court terme</a>
Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website
http://placementargent.orgSaying blogging is dead is saying that people will communicate in only segments of 140 characters for the rest of civilization. I may be cynical, but I’m not that cynical.
@Sushi Couldn’t agree more, mate. It’s like folks saying newspapers are dead, or news releases. As long as people have a need for something, there’ll be a demand. And going by the stats from Technorati, there’s never been a bigger demand for blogs.
Thanks for sharing the link Danny, Blogging is going nowhere when we have people like you.
Below is my comment on Grant’s blog.
“Blogging is never going to be dead anywhere sooner, For the people who say that social media tools have destroyed the blogging landscape completely, I think just the opposite has happened due to social media only good things get shared and its quite easy to figure out good ones out of the rest.
Blogging has changed many lives throughout its evolution and thats because of the recognition people get for sharing value.
Another important thing is that all the social tools are most of the times doorstep to blogs…….that is where lies the real value.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts,you have definitely made a big point here for all the so called big guys.”