<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Blogging Dead? Yep, That Old Chestnut Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/</link>
	<description>The Human Side of Media and the Social Side of Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:36:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dannybrown</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-35723</link>
		<dc:creator>dannybrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-35723</guid>
		<description>@Sushi Couldn&#039;t agree more, mate. It&#039;s like folks saying newspapers are dead, or news releases. As long as people have a need for something, there&#039;ll be a demand. And going by the stats from Technorati, there&#039;s never been a bigger demand for blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sushi Couldn&#8217;t agree more, mate. It&#8217;s like folks saying newspapers are dead, or news releases. As long as people have a need for something, there&#8217;ll be a demand. And going by the stats from Technorati, there&#8217;s never been a bigger demand for blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushi</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-35722</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-35722</guid>
		<description>Saying blogging is dead is saying that people will communicate in only segments of 140 characters for the rest of civilization. I may be cynical, but I&#039;m not that cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying blogging is dead is saying that people will communicate in only segments of 140 characters for the rest of civilization. I may be cynical, but I&#8217;m not that cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellyka</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-35641</link>
		<dc:creator>ellyka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-35641</guid>
		<description>Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website
http://placementargent.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website<br />
<a href="http://placementargent.org" rel="nofollow">http://placementargent.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellyka</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-35640</link>
		<dc:creator>ellyka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-35640</guid>
		<description>Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website

&lt;a href=&quot;http://placementargent.org&quot;&gt;Placement court terme&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you. After skimming through your website</p>
<p>&lt;a href=&#8221;http://placementargent.org&#8221;&gt;Placement court terme&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18912</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18912</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good point, Rich. There&#039;s such a crossover at the minute between what defines a blog and website that a lot of folks think it&#039;s simply a website. In that respect, then yes, blogging would appear dead. 

But you&#039;re right - it&#039;s anything but, and I&#039;m often of the same mind as you that a lot of it is down to linkbait. Hey ho :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good point, Rich. There&#8217;s such a crossover at the minute between what defines a blog and website that a lot of folks think it&#8217;s simply a website. In that respect, then yes, blogging would appear dead. </p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right &#8211; it&#8217;s anything but, and I&#8217;m often of the same mind as you that a lot of it is down to linkbait. Hey ho <img src='http://dannybrown.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Becker</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18910</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18910</guid>
		<description>Danny, 

I think we agree that &quot;anything dead&quot; is equal to &quot;anything linkbait&quot; anymore. 

I was reading a study today regarding moms and marketing, and it clearly shows that more than 50 percent read blogs regularly (and this number is trending up). Of course, there is also an increasing number of people who cannot distinguish a blog from a Web site or news site. 

My intern even demonstrated her uncertainly the other day. She said she believed one story over another because one was on a blog and other was on a news site. As it turned out, they were both blogs, with the one she dismissed authored by a respected journalist. 

All my best, 
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, </p>
<p>I think we agree that &#8220;anything dead&#8221; is equal to &#8220;anything linkbait&#8221; anymore. </p>
<p>I was reading a study today regarding moms and marketing, and it clearly shows that more than 50 percent read blogs regularly (and this number is trending up). Of course, there is also an increasing number of people who cannot distinguish a blog from a Web site or news site. </p>
<p>My intern even demonstrated her uncertainly the other day. She said she believed one story over another because one was on a blog and other was on a news site. As it turned out, they were both blogs, with the one she dismissed authored by a respected journalist. </p>
<p>All my best,<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Blogging Dead or is Steve Rubel Wrong : seowizards</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18872</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Blogging Dead or is Steve Rubel Wrong : seowizards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18872</guid>
		<description>[...] More: Is Blogging Dead or is Steve Rubel Wrong [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More: Is Blogging Dead or is Steve Rubel Wrong [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18866</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18866</guid>
		<description>As I just replied to you over on Grant&#039;s post, I&#039;ll echo here with a link to http://ariwriter.com/why-blogging-is-not-dying/ which I wrote 14 months ago that is in direct parallel to both of your thoughts.

If I didn&#039;t have an interest in replying to you here, or replying to Grant there, then you would be correct in your assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I just replied to you over on Grant&#8217;s post, I&#8217;ll echo here with a link to <a href="http://ariwriter.com/why-blogging-is-not-dying/" rel="nofollow">http://ariwriter.com/why-blogging-is-not-dying/</a> which I wrote 14 months ago that is in direct parallel to both of your thoughts.</p>
<p>If I didn&#8217;t have an interest in replying to you here, or replying to Grant there, then you would be correct in your assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18864</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18864</guid>
		<description>Again, assumption is often simply another word for ignoring an interest in other views. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, assumption is often simply another word for ignoring an interest in other views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://dannybrown.me/2010/01/21/is-blogging-dead-yep-that-old-chestnut-again/#comment-18863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannybrown.me/?p=10130#comment-18863</guid>
		<description>We seem to have a disconnect so let me restate my opinion:

If someone is subscribed to your blog, whether by RSS or email delivery, then it is fair to presume he or she is knowledgeable enough about blogs to know to subscribe and not to merely bookmark your website in a browser.

If agreed, then wouldn&#039;t you also agree that said subscriber -- who may be reading this back-and-forth debate between you and me right now -- knows what a blog is, grasps its value, and wouldn&#039;t be swayed by opinions that blogging is dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We seem to have a disconnect so let me restate my opinion:</p>
<p>If someone is subscribed to your blog, whether by RSS or email delivery, then it is fair to presume he or she is knowledgeable enough about blogs to know to subscribe and not to merely bookmark your website in a browser.</p>
<p>If agreed, then wouldn&#8217;t you also agree that said subscriber &#8212; who may be reading this back-and-forth debate between you and me right now &#8212; knows what a blog is, grasps its value, and wouldn&#8217;t be swayed by opinions that blogging is dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

