The Future is Now

The tablet does open so many more possibilities for small touch screens. I really feel that might be the market instead of replacing the netbooks. A great blog entry:)
.-= Rob Cairns´s most recent blog post ...6 People In History I Would Like To Meet And Have Dinner With =-.

Wowser, that's impressive.

I can't help but wonder if the "we're working on that" features will never arrive because they are just too darn expensive.

So I guess the revenue model for this is subscriptions and advertising? Print ads are already expensive enough to produce, imagine the cost of producing videos to the magazines specs...

One more thing - the potential for OOS or RSI for tablet PC's, that's why the mouse is so good, I can operate my PC using a mouse for 10 hours a day with no trouble, could you do the same with a touch screen?
.-= Sheldon Nesdale´s most recent blog post ...What Does Your Website Look Like In Different Browsers? Different Screen Sizes? Different Colour Settings? =-.

All I can say is, holy crap. I was skeptical about the new Apple tablet until I saw this.

Thanks, Danny, for giving me yet another device that I want to purchase. :)
.-= Caleb Gardner´s most recent blog post ...Avoid Hampster-Wheel Syndrome =-.

Warning, this parade may get rainy.

Do I like it? Sure. But I don't see anything in this video that's that groundbreaking. The touch interface is nice, but the actual software concepts behind this demo have been around for a while. A static image that launches into a video. A slideshow. Links that pop up little information chunks. Even real-time updates of game statistics. Unless I'm missing something, it's all been done before. It's just rearranged into a tidy package.

Yes, it's a better experience. No question. And therefore it will probably drive sales because the information SI offers will be in a more user-friendly format than a relatively archaic magazine or traditional website. But it's an experience we could have had (at least on the software end) last year, easily.

I would be interested to see them go into more depth about exactly how much more interactive this is than what we already have, because more interaction possibilities = more engaged consumer + more/better data for advertisers/editors.

So, in sum, I believe the hardware will merely be the sugar coating that will get people to use the software, which is where the real depth of something like this will kick in. Will publishers take advantage of that depth? Time will tell. I have not been impressed by the mainstream media's usage of web assets (speaking very generally).

(In case it sounds like I'm whining, I'm not really. I'm working on two projects right now with two traditional media outlets to drastically enhance user experience on the web. Maybe I'm jealous? ;))

Awesome - i know what I am spending my money on next. I am a Apple junkie and proud of it. On the other note - the possibilities are truly endless, not just from marketing point of view but education, commerce, banking etc. And yes, a cloud will be a part of it too. As it stands I am working with a publisher who struggles with transition from print to online media - this will be an important piece to close that experience gap.

Danny,

I agree with @Justin. Cloud computing will be the next step jump, once they figure out the all pervasive, and nagging issues of privacy, security, international law etc.

Apple is already talking about music from the heavens or cloud :))

Here is the link to the article.
http://ow.ly/Zl4F

Btw, it seems to me that cloud computing advances we are talking about, are a few years away. Is that your feeling too??

Cheers,
http://correlationist.wordpress.com
.-= correlationist´s most recent blog post ...Darwinism & Social Media =-.

Apple's ability to get inside the head of the end user, and then design something two steps ahead of what we think is possible, continues to amaze me.
.-= Global Patriot´s most recent blog post ...Supreme Court Decimates Democracy =-.

Also, people keep on mentioning Apple. I may have missed something, but isn't this proprietary hardware produced by TWF/Time Inc? The logo at the top of the device would seem to indicate so, but I may have missed something.

The tablet does open so many more possibilities for small touch screens. I really feel that might be the market instead of replacing the netbooks. A great blog entry:)
.-= Rob Cairnsu00c2u00b4s most recent blog post ...6 People In History I Would Like To Meet And Have Dinner With =-.

Wowser, that's impressive.

I can't help but wonder if the "we're working on that" features will never arrive because they are just too darn expensive.

So I guess the revenue model for this is subscriptions and advertising? Print ads are already expensive enough to produce, imagine the cost of producing videos to the magazines specs...

One more thing - the potential for OOS or RSI for tablet PC's, that's why the mouse is so good, I can operate my PC using a mouse for 10 hours a day with no trouble, could you do the same with a touch screen?
.-= Sheldon Nesdaleu00c2u00b4s most recent blog post ...What Does Your Website Look Like In Different Browsers? Different Screen Sizes? Different Colour Settings? =-.

All I can say is, holy crap. I was skeptical about the new Apple tablet until I saw this.

Thanks, Danny, for giving me yet another device that I want to purchase. :)
.-= Caleb Gardneru00c2u00b4s most recent blog post ...Avoid Hampster-Wheel Syndrome =-.

Hi there Danny, if that is the near future its extremely fascinating, Apple can easily deliver this scintillating experience.The opportunities which it produces for people from different communities are also vast...Lets look forward to getting this soon.

Warning, this parade may get rainy.

Do I like it? Sure. But I don't see anything in this video that's that groundbreaking. The touch interface is nice, but the actual software concepts behind this demo have been around for a while. A static image that launches into a video. A slideshow. Links that pop up little information chunks. Even real-time updates of game statistics. Unless I'm missing something, it's all been done before. It's just rearranged into a tidy package.

Yes, it's a better experience. No question. And therefore it will probably drive sales because the information SI offers will be in a more user-friendly format than a relatively archaic magazine or traditional website. But it's an experience we could have had (at least on the software end) last year, easily.

I would be interested to see them go into more depth about exactly how much more interactive this is than what we already have, because more interaction possibilities = more engaged consumer + more/better data for advertisers/editors.

So, in sum, I believe the hardware will merely be the sugar coating that will get people to use the software, which is where the real depth of something like this will kick in. Will publishers take advantage of that depth? Time will tell. I have not been impressed by the mainstream media's usage of web assets (speaking very generally).

(In case it sounds like I'm whining, I'm not really. I'm working on two projects right now with two traditional media outlets to drastically enhance user experience on the web. Maybe I'm jealous? ;))

Awesome - i know what I am spending my money on next. I am a Apple junkie and proud of it. On the other note - the possibilities are truly endless, not just from marketing point of view but education, commerce, banking etc. And yes, a cloud will be a part of it too. As it stands I am working with a publisher who struggles with transition from print to online media - this will be an important piece to close that experience gap.

Danny,

I agree with @Justin. Cloud computing will be the next step jump, once they figure out the all pervasive, and nagging issues of privacy, security, international law etc.

Apple is already talking about music from the heavens or cloud :))

Here is the link to the article.
http://ow.ly/Zl4F

Btw, it seems to me that cloud computing advances we are talking about, are a few years away. Is that your feeling too??

Cheers,
http://correlationist.wordpress.com
.-= correlationistu00c2u00b4s most recent blog post ...Darwinism & Social Media =-.

I will not be surprised when Apple succeeds with this. The path seems very similar to the iPod launch years ago. They are great at building the necessary content systems for their devices that "close the loop". I suspect it will bring new life and business models to the publishing industry just as iTunes has for the delivery of music. It's not just the hardware, but the total user experience that is the key.

Apple's ability to get inside the head of the end user, and then design something two steps ahead of what we think is possible, continues to amaze me.
.-= Global Patriotu00c2u00b4s most recent blog post ...Supreme Court Decimates Democracy =-.

Think cloud computing. Access to any content -- e.g. all different app stores -- via a device like this one. It's the perfect hybrid between a computer and a smartphone (so many people think the screen is too small too use Web, apps frequently).

I agree, could be a game changer. But I think Kindle could have been too. All about usability and how much control users have over accessing the content they want.

My two cents. Yours?