Audi and the Super Bowl Social Media Shit Storm




German car manufacturer Audi may be about to enter a PR shit storm, thanks to the naming of their social media campaign in the run-up to their Super Bowl ad.

The campaign (run by Audi of America) is based around a new creation called the Green Police, who will spearhead a social media program to build interest in Audi’s ad at this year’s football showcase. The Green Police enforce ways to protect the environment, and encourage people to a better understanding of environmental issues. There’s currently a series of YouTube mock education videos as part of the program, as well as a Green Police Twitter account.

The problem is, there’s already been a Green Police enforcement organization, but not one that you’d want to be associated with. This Green Police was part of the Nazi persecution and execution of millions of Jews in the Holocaust of the Second World War.

The implications of Audi’s choice of name for their campaign could be huge, especially since Audi is a German company. The first question is obvious – didn’t anyone at Audi’s PR or advertising arm/agency do any research?

It’ll be interesting to see how this unfolds and what Audi’s response will be as the connections to an unwanted history become clear, especially as today marks the 65th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp.

What’s your take on what Audi should do next?

  • Update February 01 2010: Audi of America has issued a response to the post, which you can find here. While their response is sound, they may also wish to look at this resource from the Jewish Virtual Library vaults (if they haven’t already), or this report for further correlation. Additionally, Audi state that they researched and tested the ads prior to running them, and sought input from the Jewish community. Curiosity begs the question: if the research prior to the ad being run didn’t return any “red flags” about possible connotations to the term Green Police, why the need to seek input from the Jewish community about an environmentally friendly product?

Get my latest posts straight to your inbox!


DannyBrown.me runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Framework

Genesis empowers you to quickly and easily build amazing websites with WordPress.

Whether you're new to WordPress or an advanced developer, Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go. It's that simple - start using Genesis now!


Genesis comes with 6 default layout options, comprehensive SEO settings, rock-solid security, flexible theme options, cool custom widgets, custom design hooks, and a huge selection of child themes ("skins") that make your site look the way you want it to. With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

For a company such as Audi naming their campaign after a campaign responsible for the execution of millions of Jews in the Holocaust of the Second World War is pathetic.
Wont be surprised if they have serous backlash and that too from their own country men.

Gag, this nasty chunky ad is still making the rounds... Ya know? You missed the correlation between Audi's Green Police ad and all the previous creepy ads from the brief Electric Car era, where car companies used bizarre, unpleasant ads to "Unsell" a great group of zippy autos that would have helped prevent the current global urgency. Not to mention a new war. Audi's hefty diesel SUV is not really *that* green and this creepy ad is shaped perfectly to target middle-aged white men and get them to jerk that knee on something. This ad will only attract people who actually hate environmental care, don’t understand the correlation between environmental abuse and illegal immigration or increased taxes, but still wanting to grab a tax break. This smells like anti-green propaganda, not sales. The target is Teabaggers. Audi and all the rest could trot electric cars off the factory rack within months, which would get over 3 times the mileage. The lack of engine vibration in battery-run autos would also prevent considerable wear and tear on the vehicle and the ensuing repair bills we have to pay.

Personally, I have to think that fewer replacement part sales have to affect how totally auto and oil are married to each other. But paying to fix your SUV doesn't make you happy or rich. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/25/paul.commentary/

I don't care if two Jewish people say this is ad is not offensive. I'm sure their were Jewish leaders supportive (of you know whom).
The ad campaign is some strange propaganda message in line with a current worldwide political movement of Global Warming/ Carbon Tax. That, by the way was the genesis of the Nazi Party, and the Communist party. Yeah, that's right....both sides were funded by the same people. This is a fact, that can be easily read in the Library of Congress. You can just look up"trading with the enemies act", and cross reference Prescott Bush. Even without history knowledge, people can smell B.S., that is why these ads are going to continue offending people...

I appreciate your story here, Danny. I wasn't involved in the pre-Super Bowl (following the campaign or reading your post)hype for the program. So I saw the commercial "blindly" during it's run on the Super Bowl. I enjoyed it's tongue-in-cheek humor and felt it was poking a bit of fun at the whole green movement. That being said, I have heard a lot of commentary post-airing and must admit, I haven't heard any controversy surrounding the Nazi connection. Just both sides arguing over who's on the wrong side of this eco-debate. I only say that as an outsider looking in and not debating in this echo chamber (not to offend here - lack of a better term). I live just outside of Manhattan and work in the New York area, so I felt that I should just post this for you. It's still an interesting take, and not one that should be taken lightly particualarly from a PR stance. I'm also noticing, though, that people are just getting fed up with PC commentary (again not from this venue but more from the talking heads on TV and radio - and Washington) on what's proper and improper to talk about - maybe that's carrying over to this debate? I don't know. Keep up the good work.

Hey there Gary,

Thanks for stopping by, fella. I agree - sometimes points that deserve to be heard (and I'm not putting this post in there - just using a generic example) often disappear due to apathy over "argument for argument's sake".

It's a shame, as I've seen some terrific points of view over a great many topics shuffle out of view, simply because the topic has been covered to death, and not always in an open manner.

RE. the Audi campaign, it was interesting to see it voted both best and worst of SuperBowl - guess it's one of those "no middle ground" moments. And that's not even taking into consideration the other points of view around it... ;-)

Again, thanks for stopping by and offering your view, much appreciated.

Outside of Israel no one knows that the Green Police is the law enforcement agency for environmental regulations in that country.
When I heard the term Green Police in the Audi commercial during the superbowl I instantly recalled everything I'd ever read about the Green Police of Nazi Germany and Nazi occupied Holland and of all the otrocities that they committed.
Audi needs to pull that commercial and hope that this all goes away quickly.
People need to let Audi know that this nonsense will not be tolerated.

Here is one for ya Danny boy. I have never been so offended by something on TV EVER!!!!!!!! So much so I was suppose to pick up a TT for my daughter as a belated birthday present. But after watching the Nazis on TV during the superbowl I will instead demand my security deposit back and will be getting in touch with corporate to express outrage.
In case you have not noticed the neocon fascist global elite are trying to install a New World Order and the Police are a Very real Concept in the USA right now.

so who in the F@)!K do you think you are to pull this kind of crap. I promise I am not the last American offended by this. Get ready to lose lots of business and I think it is time for a global boycott on the Nazis audi and Danny boy.

Well, it DID allow them to go viral. So maybe they did it on purpose?
.-= Jamie Harrington´s most recent blog post ...Winner of the Farm Animals Autographed Book =-.

I just posted this on Fourtitude. I had access to Audi execs this week and did some inquiry. It'll help everyone here make a more informed decision as they can now see the other side of the story and it answers Danny's original question.

Begin Post...

Late last week we covered a story about a blogger who equated the 'Green Police' theme of Audi's upcoming Super Bowl ad campaign starring the A3 TDI to a Nazi-era German police unit known as the Ordnungspolizei (translates directly to 'Order Police'). It seems that a Googling of the term provided the author or his source of the obscure nickname of 'Green Police'. Given Audi is German and so too were the Nazis, the author drew a comparison suggestion that he believed Audi had used poor judgement or hadn't researched the term, using the ad either ignorantly or despite any supposed known offense the ad might represent. The story has since run on Autoblog.com and Jalopnik.com, prominent blogs in the auto industry, and has made ripple further on Twitter and amongst blogger Danny Brown's own readers - many of whom seem to be in the business of PR or social media consultancy and not entirely without interest in the matter. For the record, I write this while at the same time being editor in chief of an Audi-focused online magazine and have my own obvious interest that also comes with a fair degree of expertise with the company in question.

I have been able to hear Audi's side of the story and have also previewed the ad in question. The ad won't air until the Super Bowl but I can give you the story from Audi's side rather than rushing to judgement and share a basic synopsis of the ad. First, let me start by quoting the question Danny asked.

"The implications of Audi’s choice of name for their campaign could be huge, especially since Audi is a German company. The first question is obvious – didn’t anyone at Audi’s PR or advertising arm/agency do any research?"

The short answer to Danny Brown is 'Yes, they did research it and followed up that research with further due diligence as a result of the story.' As Audi initially checked background on their ad concept, not one person with whom Audi inquired drew any association with the term 'green police' other than the obvious timely reference to environmental matters. To quote Audi representatives "We researched the term. We tested the ad concept with focus groups. We sought input and reaction from key organizations, including the Jewish community, and we sent out a press release that went to thousands of media, and not one reaction."

Since learning of the public questioning of Audi's judgement in the matter both on Twitter and Danny Brown's blog, Audi of America immediately consulted several notable and prominent Jewish community resources including the Anti Defamation League and the Holocaust Museum. Further, I am told by Audi that the holocaust museum went further with the inquiry by asking the opinion of several holocaust survivors. Rather than an anonymous Google search or user-edited Wikipedia reference Audi took the time to go to those who could directly speak for the Jewish community and not one reference felt the term 'Green Police' insinuated anything other than environmental awareness enforcement. It's been mentioned several times over during this debate that Israel themselves have an environmental unit known as the 'Green Police' as do many other countries.

From everything I have seen, Audi takes this matter very seriously though I suspect they have largely stayed away from responding to it so as not to give it any more merit than it is due. The reality of the situation is that there was no malicious intent, no wanton action, no lack of care in deciding upon the campaign.

Danny Brown mentioned his attempt to make contact with Audi of America. My source says they have no record of a Danny Brown attempting to make contact for a response. The only inquiry that came through via the usual PR channels arrived through contacts listed on the original press release and that inquiry was from Ari Herzog, a commenter on Brown's blog who originally argued against the merits of the post based on Israel's own 'Green Police' unit. Brown may have attempted contact but Audi is unaware of what method he took and would have known had it come in the expected PR channels a member of the media like Danny Brown would be expected to use.

Yesterday Danny also responded to a reply on the subject posted by Audi on Autoblog.com. It reads...

"Update February 01 2010: Audi has issued a response to the post, which you can find here. While their response is sound, they may also wish to look at this resource from the Jewish Virtual Library vaults." (Ling Above in Danny's Post)

I just did my own quick search and the word 'Green' is nowhere on the linked page.

Tonight I was also able to preview the upcoming Super Bowl ad. In it are the same Green Police comedic enviro cop unit as the preview videos. The ficticious group of slightly inept environmental do-gooders is used to show that simply being green or environmentally aware isn't always easy to determine. Toward the end of the ad there is a product shot of the already confirmed Audi A3. The message is not one of violence and simply one meant to raise awareness of Audi's TDI Clean Diesel movement and that it is one way you can be green. The ad is light-hearted and, in my opinion, rather innocently plays at the environmental theme.

Will this post end the discussion on the matter? Likely not. World War II was a tragic portion of world history and far be it from me to tell someone what should or shouldn't offend them. My hope though is that people will see both sides of this story and perhaps be a little less judgmental about a company and line of automobiles for which I have a lot of respect and share a strong affinity. I know these people. These are good and thorough people who've created one of the best marketed brands in the industry through as much attention to detail in marketing as they also instill in their cars. I find it unfortunate that many without any knowledge of the situation and a tenuous association based on a wikipedia entry would pass judgement and I do hope that this post will at least educates those so that they may make an informed and intelligent decision of their own.
.-= George´s most recent blog post ...Audi Sport Plans R15 "plus" Test Run in Le Mans Series Round at Le Castellet =-.

Hi George,

Thank you for the reply and Audi's response. I'll quote and reply as per you have, to answer your points:

“We researched the term. We tested the ad concept with focus groups. We sought input and reaction from key organizations, including the Jewish community, and we sent out a press release that went to thousands of media, and not one reaction.”

Fair response. Yet one thing stands out; if there was no connection made prior to the link to the historical connotation of the name Green Police, why was anyone of the Jewish community approached for an ad about the environment? Wouldn't a community - in this case, Jewish - only be approached if a company was aware of a potential hiccup? And I'm a little surprised (as were many other commenters who asked the same question) how it wasn't spotted during initial research when a simple Google search sees it sat at #3. I think this answer actually raises more questions. Or maybe that's just me ;-)

With reference the Google, wikipedia, research, etc angle on the Green Police, my original link for reference was to the article by the editor of the award-winning Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust, published in 1990. I think that adds some credence to the connection.

From everything I have seen, Audi takes this matter very seriously though I suspect they have largely stayed away from responding to it so as not to give it any more merit than it is due. The reality of the situation is that there was no malicious intent, no wanton action, no lack of care in deciding upon the campaign.

Audi's take on the matter (as far as intent goes) was never in question; what the post raised was whether it was about to cause an issue, and how in-depth the initial research was. I believe that such an important campaign (Audi's first real foray into social media) would definitely have stringent and extensive research; which again just comes back to the question, "How was Google result #3 missed?". Even just highlighting it to an exec responsible for the green-lighting of the campaign for clarification; yet Audi's response is that nothing popped up, which is why there was no need to worry about a connection.

My source says they have no record of a Danny Brown attempting to make contact for a response.

Initially I could find no information for contact on the press release sharing the news (there wasn't one on the release I read), so I went via the Contact option on Audi's website, with a link to the story and full contact info for me. Ari actually BCC-included me on his email to Kevin Ray at PMKBNC (kudos to Ari for getting the email) and I then sent an email of my own on January 29.

Yesterday Danny also responded to a reply on the subject posted by Audi on Autoblog.com. It reads…

“Update February 01 2010: Audi has issued a response to the post, which you can find here. While their response is sound, they may also wish to look at this resource from the Jewish Virtual Library vaults.” (Ling Above in Danny’s Post)

I just did my own quick search and the word ‘Green’ is nowhere on the linked page.

That is correct - the piece uses the official name for the police arm that were known by the term Green Police (as referenced in my post). However, as mentioned by more than a few people in the comments section of this post, they are one and the same. This article on DailyFinance.com offers more details on the connection between the two.

I find it unfortunate that many without any knowledge of the situation and a tenuous association based on a wikipedia entry would pass judgement and I do hope that this post will at least educates those so that they may make an informed and intelligent decision of their own.

Obviously the YouTube ads are part of a bigger picture, and one that only a few will see prior to the Super Bowl slot. However, the original link is more than a "tenuous Wikipedia link" (as I highlight above), and it's not passing judgement on the videos and choice of name; it's questioning the research and awareness (or lack of) and what internal discussions were had (if any).

One of the key things that has been noticed (and was talked about this evening on Twitter in the #pr20chat forum) is Audi (or their agency of record)'s response. There have been numerous examples of situations where a brand's campaign tactics have either been questioned or raised curious glances; some have been responded to well, some not so much (the Motrin Mom example is a good one on how even a couple of days is a long time in social media).

For such an important part of Audi's 2010 promotional push, their (or their agency's) reticence to at least acknowledge the questions being raised in the comments is questionable. And this isn't from a "listen to me" angle. Before Audi's statements elsewhere, there had been over 100 comments on this post alone and more than 300 retweets. Not to mention the discussions online.

I'm in the comms and social media industry, and have been for more than 15 years (as have the majority of the commenters here). Even a simple "We're aware of your questions and are/will be looking into it" would show that the company is listening to what's being said about their brand. As it is, there were various reasons suggested as to the lack of comment ("not to give it more merit than it is due" is a mistake many companies new to the social scene make, unfortunately).

Audi's response (as I mention in the update) is sound. Their explanation of their post-this article actions is also sound. However, as I mention, there are still some questions that may be new due to the response.

Again, as I mentioned on Twitter tonight, George, I do appreciate all the effort put in by you and for sharing it here.

Best,

Danny.

Danny has updated this post. Before commenting about how he's a Lemming and those of us who felt the news disturbing are also lemmings (and whatever other trash talk you got cooked up) take a look at the actual post and read his update at the bottom.
.-= Ct Kingston´s most recent blog post ...The Death of Sex =-.

I can definitely see why folks are in an uproar. With this great little invention called the internet, mistakes like this she not be made. Cover your assets people.
This is a PR nightmare! Time for some crisis management!

GREAT POST!

Holy Mutha! It's outrageous! I can't add much to the multitude of great comments above... Thanks for pointing this out to me and all of us. I'm as appalled as anyone should be. How can anyone be so daft and get paid so much for it?
.-= Christina Kingston´s most recent blog post ...The Death of Sex =-.

I understand the hard feelings about Nazi Germany BUT please calm down a little. A google search for The Green Police just now - give you these results among others (below).

If Israel, New York City and Bangalore have no problem with the green police, why should Audi and you?

The Green Police of the Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection http://www.sviva.gov.il/bin/en.jsp?enPage=e_BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=Zone&enDispWho=green_po&enZone=green_po

NYC Green Police http://planetgreen.discovery.com/work-connect/nyc-green-police.html

Bangalore Green Police http://www.thehindu.com/2009/07/21/stories/2009072155010500.htm

Maybe we can keep the things in perspective AND

NO: Audi ist not paying or instructing me to post this
YES: I like Audi cars and drive one

Well,
don't get me wrong, but this just sounds like a bunch of PR-junkies with an overly destructive concern about political correctness. I mean, right, there's this past - but shouldn't we rather talk about that this add campaign as a whole is total crap? What does this have to do with Audi - that is to say with DRIVING A CAR or if you want CLEAN DRIVING.
People watching won't recognize AUDI let alone get the Nazi take of the GReen police.

This is not a big deal. Some dumb blogger pretending he's Woodward and Bernstein and making this into some big scandal, which it isnt. Audi is a quality auto manufacturer, who made a simple mistake, on a phrase that im betting no one else on this site had ever heard of before today. They'll probably just pull the ad and move on.

Actually, what's even worse, assuming this does generate heat, is the connotation that environmentalists are like nazis. The "Green cop" thing is clearly meant as a tongue in cheek joke, so I laugh, but some folks hear the term "green" and "nazi" together and all kinds of idiocy transpires....
.-= Nick Aster´s most recent blog post ...SEC Votes To Issue Guidance On Climate Change Risk Disclosure =-.

Fascinating slip up, but I have to agree it probably wont generate too much heat. What I wonder is, will there be a backlash against Audi for claiming "green cred" when their best vehicle is still miles behind a Prius in terms of mpg? The ads are quite funny, however.
.-= Nick Aster´s most recent blog post ...SEC Votes To Issue Guidance On Climate Change Risk Disclosure =-.

So the basic contention is that it's somehow wantonly insensitive on Audi's part. I'm of the belief that if the name is proper enough for Israel to use then its content is universal and thus neutral and not insensitive. I somehow doubt Israel would use uniquely and immediately identifiable Nazi terms such as Gestapo or SS. Yet they do use 'Green Police'. One would think if any country or group had a right to be sensitive on the issue it would be Israel, yet there they are using the name.
.-= George´s most recent blog post ...New Driver Trio for the Audi R15 TDI =-.

From what I have seen the work is so bad and uninspiring it won't matter. Then again, in the world of viral, you never know. As for the name, if the press makes a big deal of it then it will be an issue. But I doubt otherwise that anyone will take notice. Kudos for calling it out, does point out an incredible insensitivity, especially for a
German company.
.-= Edward Boches´s most recent blog post ...What you really want to be is a brand that’s loved =-.

First in the spirit of full disclosre I want to clarify that I do run a website that centers around Audi and their products and I do know people in their marketing dept and at their American agency who likely created this. I have not spoken to them on this subject. All of that said...

I have a beef with today's journalistic and blog environment where comments like the infamous 'lipstick on a pig' are blown out of proportion by those who wish to manipulate or make a story out of a non story in order to drive prominence or viewership. I don't know the author of this piece, but use of salacious words like 'shitstorm' in the title are enough to make me further ponder the motivations behind the piece. Audi is a hot property, and German and making a case for its association with the Nazis seems like a great way to drive traffic.

I think the premise of this report is a total reach. First, the police unit in question (according to Wikipedia and the much-referenced Google) was named the Ordnungspolizei and not the "Green Police".

They were called "Green Police" (actually not Green Police but equivalent in German) by the general public of the time because of the color of their uniform. Incidentally, the German police today wear green uniforms and I'd challenge those who insist on seeing a parallel between Audi's reference and the Ordnungspolizei to walk up to any modern German policeman and also accuse him or her of being a Nazi because he still wears a green uniform? I mean, why not right? How could the German police be so careless, so insensitive?

In the reality of today's schema 'green police' represents enforcement of environmental laws or rules. That Israel refers to their own environmental unit as 'Green Police' is enough for me to end debate about the merits of the term's must-be 'Nazi' ownership. It's a general term and thus a slippery slope.

If you're going to go after Audi (of America BTW, not Audi Germany) for using a general term also loosely associated with the Nazis then why not go after any German entity using any loose association? Nazis also used the colors red and black and the image of the eagle. Should that keep any German from ever using the colors red and black or the Eagle lest he be accused of being a Nazi? Somebody better write a blog post then about the German national soccer team because their red and black uniforms feature a logo with an eagle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_national_football_team

Also, for context, these are teaser videos made to drum up interest in the eventual Super Bowl ad. The ad is known to focus on Audi's A3 TDI diesel, which gets 42 mpg highway. The ad has not yet been shown publicly and will debut during the Super Bowl, so the actual context of the Green Police or how they play in the commercial remains to be seen.

The company is a leader in diesel, races it at Le Mans and is also a leader in lightweight production having produced some of their vehicles in aluminum since the 1990s. They have both hybrid and all-electric models in the pipeline that will be for sale on the market within a year and built their first series production electric/diesel hybrid in the 1990s when the Prius was but a sparkle in Toyota's eye. So yes, they do have green cred.

Hi George,

Thanks for a) the diclosure and b) the thoughtful and in-depth comment, I appreciate both.

The terminology is simply the way I speak; regular readers of this blog (and connections online) know that I write as I speak. Sometimes that may not be terms people either expect (or want to hear), but it's simply who I am. It's no different from me using "shit storm" down the local pub.

I actually link to the resources you mention, so that people can see the definition behind the Green Police name.

As the whole post adheres to (and the subsequent comments), this isn't an "attack" on a country or brand. It's a question about the merits of the connection between a name, history and the launch of the campaign's big push (the Auschwitz anniversary). It's a question about brands in the new digital space today, and how crucial and increasingly important the right strategy is.

Deliberate or otherwise, brands need to be aware of all possibilities from a new launch or media campaign. There are so many countless examples of poorly executed or implemented social media campaigns that to see a brand as large and respected as Audi make what would seem an ill-conceived decision makes you wonder about the strategy behind it.

As I mentioned in earlier comments, the real "distaste" will/may come from anyone that knows the reasons behind the name and its history, and has a personal, emotional connect; I'm merely offering a view from a PR and social media/marketing/branding angle.

Thanks again for joining the conversation, I do appreciate it.

Hi Danny, Thanks for the level-headed response. The tough part about today's media environment is that, as with lipstick on a pig, you are always going to offend someone, somewhere, somehow. I believe, though Wikipedia is highly placed in Google, the suggestion that 'Green Police' is a nazi-unique term is a weak one. It is general. That Israel also uses the term is more than enough to make this point. Nazis and the German public of the time used a lot of terms. Should every one be taboo? Where is the litmus drawn?

I made an assumption about your title choice, and given your response I can logically see how/why you would have used it and that my assumption was more caricature than reality. A similar parallel could be drawn to the subject of your piece.

Yes, there was such a thing in Nazi Germany as the 'green police', and thus an assumption can be made. Given the context though of the ad (A3 TDI and environmental theme), the schema of what 'green police' represents worldwide in today's terms and the fact that the Israelis of all people also use the term, I think a logic dictates there's no intended reference.

I don't know any of the back story on how it was researched, but knowing the context above I wouldn't have been worried about its use if I were them because the correlation and thus offensiveness is most tenuous.
.-= George´s most recent blog post ...New Driver Trio for the Audi R15 TDI =-.

Perhaps Israelis use the term "green police" and if it was Israel who was behind the ad campaign, we'd be having a different discussion, but it's not, it's Germany. I think we can make this discussion purely cerebral but the bottom line is, Germany has this past, the term green police is associated with it and given these 2 indisputable facts, perhaps a different ad campaign would have been in order.
One thing Audi cannot control is the emotional response of consumers. So, we can debate if the connection warrants an emotional response, but the bottom line is Audi don't get to choose how the public will respond- and given the nature of the ad campaign and the origin of the product (Germany), isn't this a little like playing Russian roulette- and why would their marketing team want to run this type of risk? Seems like an especially slippery slope to me. I'm confident they have the talent on board to come up with an ad campaign that puts them well out of harms way and sell more cars.

I find it hard to believe that the marketing team from Audi isn't aware and cautious of all aspects relating to the Holocaust, Hitler or genocide. I think they decided that 'green' has a new meaning today - and took the risk. Personally, on the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz - I have to say it's tacky and lazy. They could have spent one more hour coming up with a new name.
Perhaps Audi is banking on all the conversation this controversy will drum up - but they will certainly lose points on many levels.
If you believe that all PR is good PR, I think you're just excusing failure. Everyone makes mistakes. Hopefully Audi will learn from this one.
.-= Alisha Paul´s most recent blog post ...Teen writers: Get your work published with Inkpop =-.

Unbelievable. In this age where we have a multitude of tools for research, it seems this key function of good PR was overlooked. I hadn't heard about this so thanks for bringing it to our attention, Danny.

Sorry, I don't find that convincing. I mean, the Green Police was Germany's "Ordnungspolizei" during Hitler's reign. As pretty much every state institution it was somehow involved in all those terrible crimes. But basically it dealt with accidents, crime of all sorts...you know what I mean. Sure, Audi and the agency should have checked it. But don't make it bigger than what it is. It's not like calling it the SS. It simply isn't the same.
.-= Gerald Hensel´s most recent blog post ...Ad spoofs. And now here comes MAFIA WARS. =-.

Wow. I'm obviously late to this party, but thanks for flagging it Mr. Brown. I think I agree with everyone else here that is wondering why on earth the company did not conduct a Google search in advance of the launch. Perhaps they did and didn't consider it a big deal because it was 60+ years ago? Don't have any idea. The name of the group isn't necessarily offensive to me, but the use of it is in very poor taste.
.-= Chuck Hemann´s most recent blog post ...WPP CEO Shares Advertising Outlook =-.

Hi Danny:
I'm personally speechless over this to say the least and am very curious about what's going to happen next. This is why I'm a huge proponent of integrated marketing communications. Something was lost in some area of the marketing department when this campaign was being conceptionalized (beyond just shitty research). Guess the quote "The path to hell is paved with good intentions" is very applicable here.

They need to fix this and be honest about what the heck they were thinking.
.-= Anna Barcelos´s most recent blog post ...Five Confessions of an Integrated Marketing Communications Marketer =-.

Enjoying your content Danny.

I don't think time heals this wound esp b/c the Holocaust is a time and lesson we shouldn't forget.

Genocide is like that.

Thank you for this information!

In this case, the saying, "No PR is bad PR" may not apply.

The Franchise King®
Joel Libava
.-= Joel Libava´s most recent blog post ...The Decade That Changed How We "Talk" =-.

I see two sides to this... The first is that I don't see anything wrong(other than being uncreative) with using Green Police. In modern times almost everyone would associate that with environmentalist police and not even think of the past. The second side is that a company the size of Audi should really have thought a little more about the whole campaign since some people will associate it with the past.

Funnily enough, Apple isn't immune to a lack of research when naming a product... Mad TV did a skit about an iPad almost 3 years ago, and its not what apple is selling!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTzhXMbOWHE

So many unpredictables when it comes to PR but this blindingly obvious. A German company that links a campaign to its Nazi past - unforgivable.
.-= Karen Swim´s most recent blog post ...Unleash Your Passion for a Perfect Performance =-.

I believe Audi did their homework, and knew what the name meant. But that just makes it all the more sad.

And the guy who called Danny an "idiot journalist" - people that resort to name calling... seriously?

Why bother reading the articles and commenting, if you think the writer is an idiot? - that's idiocy

Given that the USA has a "Green Police" to police the environment, and the UK also has a "Green Police" - I'm not sure how this can be such a bad thing?

You'd think if people saw this as an horrible term to use, that major world powers wouldn't use the name for their own environmental law enforcement.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_the_Green_Police

Maybe they did Google it and saw the same thing I did... a term that no longer has that horrific association and is in use by more than one country, with no negative impact.
.-= Laurie Pringle´s most recent blog post ...Of Fanbois and Fanatics =-.

I'm afraid 99.9% of Americans will never even make the connection. They will, however, begin to associate "Audi" with "green" which is what the purpose seems to be.
.-= Allan Misner´s most recent blog post ...iPickem.net News: College Football Bowl Games & Group Page Enhancement =-.

But they might started effin' around on Google once this fail becomes more public. And I don't think Audi wants people to ask Google if Audi helped exterminate the Jews.
.-= John Haydon´s most recent blog post ...How To Use The Q&A Section on LinkedIn to Promote Your Blog (Day 26) =-.

OH MY LORD...

FYI http://GreenPoliceForce.com forwards to their YouTube channel, so not only are they stupid - they're lazy... ;-)
.-= John Haydon´s most recent blog post ...How To Use The Q&A Section on LinkedIn to Promote Your Blog (Day 26) =-.

Heather Rast has it down cold, I think. A very unfortunate choice made by Audi. They may be wise, as suggested, to scrap it and offer a mea culpa.

The K.G.B. Agents search engine and iPad come to mind as other less insensitive yet still very odd choices for naming a new service or product.

Audi's parent company, Volkswagen, owes its inception of course to Nazi Germany and that is historical fact. While framed as fun, it's insensitive, particularly to those that survived and are watching the broadcast.

I'm not sure the campaign hits their market anyway. I love my Audi and they have been doing some fabulous television that translates the soul of the brand. But I think Audi has their pants on the ground with this one.

Not to go off subject, but many large companies in the US owe their inception to slavery...
.-= John Haydon´s most recent blog post ...How To Use The Q&A Section on LinkedIn to Promote Your Blog (Day 26) =-.

While most earlier commenters echo your position in this post, I can't help but feel like a few didn't quite get it. The issue is not simply about a German car maker's cutesy ideas. It's that the idea "hook" has the unfortunate circumstance of holding a secondary meaning, a meaning of significant historical, religious, and political import. I venture to guess few people (irrespective of religious beliefs) are going to weigh the value of cute over the value of a seriously distasteful, indiscriminate faux pas.

To be sure, mistakes happen. But when you consider the accompanying price tag for creative development/account management/production/etc., shouldn't some basic Q/A come standard? And considering the project development time for something like this, wouldn't you say there was plenty of opportunity to do some research?

It doesn't matter that Audi didn't mean to. It doesn't matter that the Holocost happened a long time ago (in today's world view). Some subjects are just sacrosanct, and in good taste you don't go there. Especially if you're a German company (was their agency tapped out of creative juice?). Was this grievous error made b/c of the fervent need to join the likes of companies with eco-friendly messages? Lame.
.-= Heather Rast´s most recent blog post ...More Than Meets The Eye =-.

I'm hoping they have a contingency plan for this one...
.-= John Haydon´s most recent blog post ...How To Use The Q&A Section on LinkedIn to Promote Your Blog (Day 26) =-.

So I'm wondering...what if they did their homework, but thought that a) enough time had passed, or b) the majority of the world wouldn't know about the reference, or c)the word Green now has a new meaning that transcends any previous usage.

I'm not saying that any of these scenarios lets them off the hook, but I'm thinking they knew about the reference, yet rationalized this campaign anyway.

(I only suggest this because I've been in executive meetings where the level of "rationalization" is beyond belief...something of a human fail.)
.-= Global Patriot´s most recent blog post ...Supreme Court Decimates Democracy =-.

I agree. It is amazing when you get a group together and there is a strong leader, or someone who is excited about the concept and all of a sudden the rest follow blindly.
.-= Richard A Marti Jr´s most recent blog post ...A Call to Help the People of Haiti =-.

If they did decide to move forward even after research, then they should have a plan to bail the campaign (and apologize) if it goes south.
.-= John Haydon´s most recent blog post ...How To Use The Q&A Section on LinkedIn to Promote Your Blog (Day 26) =-.

Between this and the iPad (which isn't offensive, just stupid), I wonder if ANYONE is doing due diligence these days. Research, focus groups--certainly SOMETHING should have revealed the connection before launching with such an unfortunate name.

Great point Laura, I was thinking the same thing. Especially after MadTV did a skit way back in 2006 about the iPad. What makes this unbelievable -- as so many comments already pointed out -- is that its so easy to research this stuff on Google. Sigh.
.-= Tom Wanek´s most recent blog post ...The Mechanism Behind Apple’s Marketing Machine =-.

Yikes! Maybe a quick renaming to... gosh anything... it's a funny campaign, but the name has the bile rising in my throat.

It's shocking how many people can sit in a room together and be stupid.
.-= Jessica Gottlieb´s most recent blog post ...Jane =-.

Hey Mike,

I don't hear anybody calling for automotive manufacturers to stop using the "SS" designation on Super Sport vehicles, or making a stink about any sports team whose colors might be Red/White/Black, so on and so forth.

Nobody needs a protest anymore to remind us that slavery and Nazis are bad.

This is satire.

I will be the first guy to defend Israel, but this is absurd.

You're only here because some idiot "journalist" decided to write an article JUST to get your fur ruffled, otherwise, you'd not have paid it an iota of attention. Don't be so easily manipulated.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] you’ve been to Danny Brown’s place today, then you’ve heard the story about Audi’s integration of the Green Police — [...]

  2. [...] constantly updated article on the iPad and its specs, features, pricing, … 5 Likes Why Audi's Green Police Social Media Program is a PR Shit Storm Audi are launching a Green Police social media program to drum up interest in their upcoming [...]

  3. [...] Cameron’s Poster Campaign The Audi “Green Police” – Like the Apple problem, but oh so much [...]

  4. [...] Why Audi's Green Police Social Media Program is a PR Shit Storm [...]

  5. [...] Originally posted here:  Why Audi's Green Police Social Media Program is a PR Shit Storm [...]

  6. [...] clever and cheeky. It’s just got one fatal flaw. The Audi Campaign features the Green Police. Danny Brown has an excellent post where he talks about the implications of the [...]

  7. [...] is taking some heat over the unintended connection one blogger made between the company’s Green Police ad that’s scheduled to debut during the Super Bowl [...]

  8. [...] is taking some heat over the unintended connection one blogger made between the company’s Green Police ad that’s scheduled to debut during the Super Bowl [...]

  9. [...] is taking some heat over the unintended connection one blogger made between the company’s Green Police ad that’s scheduled to debut during the Super Bowl [...]

  10. [...] is taking some heat over the unintended connection one blogger made between the company’s Green Police ad that’s scheduled to debut during the Super Bowl [...]

  11. [...] belangrijkste factor om goed te scoren in Google. 8 tips voor de perfecte t… 2 Tweets Why Audi's Green Police Social Media Program is a PR Shit Storm Audi are launching a Green Police social media program to drum up interest in their upcoming [...]

  12. [...] Why Audi's Green Police Social Media Program is a PR Shit StormParticularly one with the emotional scars of the Holocaust… …… so that people can see the definition behind the Green Police name. …… When I heard the term Green Police in the Audi commercial during the superbowl … [...]

  13. [...] audi commercial rap dannybrown.me [...]

  14. [...] bell audi and bbb dannybrown.me [...]

  15. [...] mistakes I can remember in a long time.  I first heard this story from social media good guy Danny Brown and then found more details over at economy blog, Daily [...]