Why Bloggers Deserve to Be Deserving



Danielle SmithThis is a guest post from Danielle Smith and is a follow-up to my recent post about PR and blogger relations.

Danielle is a former award-winning Television Anchor and Reporter who has turned her attention to the online sphere. She is the founder and primary author of ExtraordinaryMommy.com, a vlogger, online TV host, speaker and author.

More important than anything she is a mom to two sweet and sassy small people and is having the time of her life.

You can find Danielle on Twitter at @DanielleSmithTV.

I’ve said it before.

I’m not easily offended. I respect that many of us have different opinions and often feel peaceful enough about my place in the world…. that I can simply smile when we differ and walk away.

But sometimes, as was the case with the recent anonymous post from ‘Sarah’ on MomBlogMagazine, I felt as though I, as a blogger, was being baited. Sarah, an “actual employee from an actual PR company; one you have heard of if you’ve heard of any”, wrote a post titled, “Why PR People Get Paid, and You Don’t”.

Never mind that Sarah seems to think I use jealousy and misplaced entitlement as a barometer for gauging what I should be and shouldn’t be ‘getting’ in the blogging world. (That theory was inane enough for me to ignore) ** see her references to Annie A-List and Thanksgiving Dinner

Never mind that Sarah also seems to believe my blog is a whim that I may or may not choose to play with tomorrow or the day after. See this quote:

Let’s stop pretending your blog is a world-changing event and recognize it for what it is–something transient that may be gone tomorrow if you flake out or change your mind or your Uncle Vinny finds your blog and you realize you don’t really want him to know where you live because you still owe him money.

What I truly take issue with is one little word.

Deserve.

According to Sarah, I don’t DESERVE a damn thing. I’ve chosen to work at home. I’ve chosen to have this transitory-may-shut-down-any-day-blog. I’m not required to show up in an office, dressed in business casual, ready for a day of meetings. There are apparently a slew of bloggers who work much harder than me and my site may or may not be ‘ugly’.

To quote:

Make sure your number is based in reality, not what you think you deserve. Actually, if you’re using the word “deserve” at all, you’re already sunk. You don’t deserve anything. There are hundreds more bloggers out there that are willing to take a cold, hard look at what they are producing now and how they can improve in the future. Those are next year’s Annie A-Listers–a list that no one deserves to be on, but one that women work like dogs to get on.

I find this paragraph confusing – because on one hand, Sarah is right….. any number I give, any compensation I request MUST be ‘based in reality’. By ‘based in reality’, I imagine Sarah means that I do, in fact, KNOW what my time is worth… that I do, in fact, KNOW what my quality of work is worth – and NOT that I am arbitrarily assigning a ‘what-would-I-like-to-get-paid-today’ number when asked to be involved in a project.

Now, here is where things get slippery. The very next two sentences say, “Actually, if you’re using the word “deserve” at all, you’re already sunk. You don’t deserve anything.”

Yes, Sarah, I do. But not because another blogger has been compensated. Or because I’m jealous. Or because ‘you’d pay me if I was a guy’. And not because ‘PR professionals get paid, therefore I should too’. This is not a game of comparative analysis.

I deserve to be compensated for my work as a blogger.

I deserve to be compensated for the work I do because it is work.

I deserve it because I work hard and because I believe my time is valuable.

I deserve it because I provide a product (a post, a video, a campaign, etc) that benefits someone – a PR firm and/or a brand.

I deserve to be compensated because the platform I have created for myself, beginning with my blog is actually worth something. And fortunately, I know that my ‘numbers’ are based in reality.

And while Sarah is apparently not JUDGING me for…

“choosing to be a stay-at-home mom who makes money or gets stuff for the kids and family by blogging or decides to be a blogger because they were laid off and wanted to create a portfolio”

it certainly sounds a lot like judgement and an absurd over-generalization to me… Did all bloggers, or in this case ‘stay-at-home-mom-bloggers’ decide to start blogging because they were laid off? Or wanted to create a portfolio? I know I didn’t.

I understand from Sarah’s comments that she intended the post to be ‘funny’. I think it is challenging to be ‘funny’ on an average day, but on this topic? I think a more ‘serious’ tone might have been more beneficial.

How about you – do you feel deserving?

Get my latest posts straight to your inbox!


DannyBrown.me runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Framework

Genesis empowers you to quickly and easily build amazing websites with WordPress.

Whether you're new to WordPress or an advanced developer, Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go. It's that simple - start using Genesis now!


Genesis comes with 6 default layout options, comprehensive SEO settings, rock-solid security, flexible theme options, cool custom widgets, custom design hooks, and a huge selection of child themes ("skins") that make your site look the way you want it to. With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Vee 7 pts

I love it when people try to sound "smart" and so intellectual about something that they obviously know very little to nothing about. This is certainly the case for this "Sarah". Her opinions regarding what you "deserve" are based off of her experience as never working from home, never having to juggle a home business and children, never having to control her own destiny and never having to find the determination to get in a full days work when the dishes are piling up, the phone is ringing off the hook and your mother is calling for the 20th time wondering why you won't answer the phone. Ok, so maybe that is my life as a work from home mom, but either way, those are things that this woman will never understand.

LifeAfterBagels 8 pts

If she is so passionate about this topic, which it sounds like she is. I mean she took the time to write the article and have it posted. Why is she being "Sarah" and not who she really is? Why is she not mentioning the company she works for? I'm sure she is worried about how the "transient" bloggers might ban together against her or her company. Oh no wait never mind, my Uncle Vinny just called - gotta go.

prosperitygal 90 pts

Danielle and Danny,

So glad you decided to post this as I am with you and instead of smartly writing a blog post I left a comment on the said blog post. (whether it gets past moderation is another story).

What I have expereinced in business, especially new leading edge ones (yes, to the world we are still new and leading edge) is that it brings out people's fears. This is a classic case of asking "What are you so afraid of?"

Now, for saying we are not deserving ppppfffhhhh, show me how many poeple have as strong a passion for being conscious entreprenuers like bloggers. MOST of us do this because we CARE and are aligned with the core values of "Integrity, Embracing Change, Freedom from Limitied Thinking AND we plain ole care about people as well as makeing a difference.

Even in our own social media world we have folks who go into fear based modes around making money.

Deserving? So how is giving reviews make us less likely to give the good, bad and ugly? Have you read bloogers reviews really? We can be brutal sometimes.

My blog is a world changing event. WHY because my clients and readers tell me so. It has changed their world, it has changed how they think about conecting with prospects and clients. It has changed where they participate in the conversation and allowing themselves to have conversations directly with their target market (VS paying traditional media to do it for them).

Did we maybe hit a nerve because companies are wise enough to see the effect bloggers have with consumers? Do consumers trust us because we are like them and they value our feedback? DO we deserve to be creating a business around our expertise?

^&*(*&^ A we do!

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

prosperitygal I can hear the same passion in you, ProsperityGirl, that I felt as I was writing :) I really like this: "Integrity, Embracing Change, Freedom from Limitied Thinking AND we plain ole care about people as well as makeing a difference." It is just just how most bloggers operate... and truthfully, it is also what I see from most of the PR professionals I have worked with. Thanks for commenting!

jonathansaar 21 pts

I never realized there were such battle lines between the two groups of folks. I hope this does not speak to the majority of PR folks vs Bloggers. At the same time to your thoughts on deserving, I do agree that what we individually do speaks volumes for the overall outcome. My grandfather was one who taught me that if you want something, just go and get it. At the same time I have a real hard time with anyone that would discredit another group whatsoever. Bloggers may work to a different tempo than what has been coined as traditional, but what in the world is staying the same anyway? The speed in how any industry is changing is simply amazing. Those who don't keep pace with go the way of the Doe-Doe bird anyway.

I deeply appreciated your sense of passion you demonstrate here for what you do Danielle. I highly doubt anyones anonymous words will ever sway what you are determined to accomplish. Thanks for the enlightening post.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

jonathansaar Jonathan - thank you so much for your kind words. I think we get into a bit of trouble when we characterize any group in an overall tone. It really was 'Sarah's' take I disagree with most - because truly, I have worked with a number of amazing PR people and brands - both of whom don't hesitate to develop compensated relationships with bloggers if there is a mutual benefit. Thanks again!

ginidietrich 5273 pts

My blood STILL boils over this! And now you have me going all over again.

I began as a PR professional. I worked at "an actual PR company; one you have heard of if youu00e2u0080u0099ve heard of any." I was a smarty pants (OK, maybe still am) who wore suits every day and sat in "big" meetings. But I still treated reporters with the utmost respect. Because I knew, even as a junior level professional, that I couldn't do my job without them.

Now I own my own PR company, one you've probably never heard of AND I'm a blogger. I don't make money blogging. I do it because I enjoy writing, because of the insane amount of credibility it gives us, and because PR PEOPLE SUCK (hence the name - Spin Sucks). And I believe bloggers are as important, if not more, than the traditional media. Bloggers are highly influential and this baloney that any of us are fly-by-night or not working is complete bullshit.

And...I'm with you. The entire blog post written by "Sarah" smacks of judgy, judge. All I can say is...karma.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

ginidietrich Gini - the passion - I LOVE it. :) Sorry to get your blood boiling again, though I truly do respect just how much you care about this. I really do too. Good for you - starting something on your own to make sure you are doing things JUST the way you think they should be done. Thanks for adding to the conversation!

Kelli 6 pts

Great post, Danielle! "Sarah's" words were very offensive and needed a sound rebuttal like this one. Those of us who chose to be stay at home moms have every much a right to earn income as those who chose to go to work outside the home. The online medium is a gigantic blessing for many who are either home by choice or because they have to be. And we work hard. I don't sit in front of my computer screen all day long eating bon bons and reading blogs and writing quippy little posts and expect to be paid for doing nothing at all. I rise before the sun and go to sleep long after everyone else because those are the hours in which I am able to work.

In other words, as you said, I work hard. And I'm good at what I do. So why, precisely, don't I deserve to be paid again? The logic doesn't make sense. You really did a great job at refuting what was obviously a poorly thought out argument. And you did it with grace. Great job! :)

JaniceCroze 6 pts

THANK YOU for this wise, well constructed rebuttal to a post that had me shaking my head!

Like you, I usually stay on the sidelines. I am not easily offended and I try to avoid controversy online. Often it is just nasty and not the kind of thing I want to be a part of.

But I was really bothered by "Sarah's" post - and the fact that it was on a site I so respect so much!

I think "Sarah" would have to be anonymous or she may have been fired after talking so disrespecfully to an entire community of valuable, working women. I am sure her firm would not be happy with that kind of public relations!

I recognize that she may NOT have been addressing her condescending tone to ALL bloggers, incl "Annie A-List" as she calls her, but to some stereotype of an "entitled blogger" who has an "ugly" blog and who hasn't achieved the level of traffic and achievement of "Annie A-List." However, that doesn't make her post any less tactless and judgemental.

If she wanted to speak to the problem of inexperienced bloggers who do not yet have an established product or service, (eg traffic and influence,) being "entitled" then she should have done so more clearly and less rudely.

Like it has been said in the comments, I "earn" my money. I offer a product and a service and I negotiate compensation according to my own ROI for my business.

Great post Danielle and thanks for sharing your thoughts!

mommyniri 7 pts

Darn right I deserve to get paid. I deserve a lot more than people are actually paying us. We offer a value that is not imagined. We advertise - quite remarkably I might add (Zhu Zhu pets anyone?) and we create a buzz. We also create content, we question products,we create communities, we manage communities, we educate brands on what works with communities and what doesn't, we constantly and tirelessly engage our readers, we fight for social causes. Do you know anyone working such late hours and constantly "available". Yes we barely have vacations or holidays and we hold ourselves accountable - I just wish Sarah would have the guts put a face to her words.I really do believe that it is cowardly to give a holier-than-thou attitude from behind a curtain.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

mommyniri Niri - I could just see you talking as I read your comment. You are right on every point - we do all of those things - and YOU? You are stellar at all of that. Thank you for adding your voice to this!

DannyBrown 2707 pts

DanielleSmithTV mommyniri Now THAT's passion - and why I love the blogging community so much. :)

Thanks for sharing, Niri, appreciate it!

3HatsComm 803 pts

mommyniri agree with everything you said, I DO and yet my inner contrarian just has to add the caveat: it's all very important, valuable, influential.. to US. To those of us in PR, social media and marketing and of course to the readers. But with rare exceptions, bloggers aren't household names, not "celebrities" outside our communities.

Maybe that's what this "Sarah" -- and like if your giving yourself an alias, why not use "Lola" or "Mistress Fu" or something? -- was (badly) trying to do, a little perspective: yes you work hard, have great communities, etc.. but you're all not {Big Name} here. IDK... anyway, back to work.

JGoldsborough 242 pts

DannyBrown DanielleSmithTV mommyniri Amazing conversation. Wish I had gotten her earlier -- crazy week. I think the discusion you all are having about the evolution of PR and bloggers partnerships and how they have evolved is a fascinating one that we need to continue having. And Danielle, I'm glad later in the comments that you distinguished between "paying for influence" or what I might call "paying for posts" and actually developing relationships that lead to a partnership that makes sense between blogger and brand/agency/org at some point. A partnership that may - GASP, wait for it -- involve paying the blogger.

If people believe that brands/agencies aren't paying bloggers now and won't be doing so in the future, they have their head buried in the sand and just purhcased a first class ticket to Idealsville (It's just south of the Bahamas :)). The key is what kind of paid relationship do you enter and why? Do you disclose it as you should? Is it based on years of working together and buiding a mutually beneficial partnership? Or did you just go to Klout, look for the highest score and cut a check?

As far as Sarah goes, well, it wasn't worth it to her to claim her post and she felt the need to publish it anonymously. What does that tell you about her belief in what she had to say? Cheers!

DannyBrown 2707 pts

JGoldsborough DannyBrown DanielleSmithTV mommyniri Great reply, Justin (see, taking time is awesome too!) ;)

Completely agree re. the future of relationships between brands, PR and bloggers. At some point, more will become official outsourced "marketers", and that's going to really test the PR agencies that aren't understanding the shift at the minute.

Interesting times lie ahead, for sure.

DannyBrown 2707 pts

Hi Danielle,

Just wanted to say thanks for offering an excellent viewpoint, and for starting a great conversation in the comments. It's been really interesting seeing everyone's take - after all, open discussion is how we all learn. :)

Thanks again, miss, you rock!

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

DannyBrown Danny - thank YOU for giving me this opportunity to share - I have truly enjoyed the conversation. You are right - this is JUST how I learn. I definitely don't do this enough. Too much fun. I'm grateful.

DannyBrown 2707 pts

DanielleSmithTV Always welcome back here anytime, m'dear :)

Rick_LaPoint 16 pts

Hi All,

I don't know that I even consider myself a blogger. I simply do what I do.

My first thought is that I don't really care what some anonymous somebody/nobody/wanna-be has to say. Cowards can only fight one way, it seems, so there is no real defense against such tactics.

My second thought is that since these cretins continually attack bloggers they must be afraid of something, or else they would simply ignore us.

And that's all I have to say on the subject; I'm bored now. I think I'll abandon blogging and take a real job with my Uncle Vinny. At least I can work off my debt.

Rick

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

Rick_LaPoint Rick - you officially have the distinction of making me laugh the hardest. Tell Uncle Vinny I said hello and I'll be by to see him tomorrow :)

DannyBrown 2707 pts

DanielleSmithTV Rick_LaPoint Agreed - I did chuckle at the Vinny reference :)

3HatsComm 803 pts

Danielle, Like Mark I'll play contrarian but a little differently. My problem with both pieces are the use of the term "deserve." It's the entitlement, like compensation is something to be given or gifted. I don't feel deserving because of a blog post, or entitled to compension because I gave something of value. I EARN my paycheck by doing the work; it's about MERIT and getting the job done.

Which is to say that I think bloggers like you absolutely 1) work your asses off and 2) have EARNED appropriate compensation. Maybe it's the ad revenue or comps, maybe it is payment or being hired (with requisite disclosure) but IMO it's more than just deserving your props, you've worked for and EARNED them. FWIW.

MarkDykeman 12 pts

3HatsComm I like the way you've put it. I think there could be an unreasonable sense of entitlement out there among some people.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

3HatsComm Fair enough. I will give you that the term 'earned' is FAR BETTER than deserve in terms of qualifying a position on this debate. I did choose to use the word after reading Sarah's sentence, "you don't deserve anything'. That being said, it likely would have been more powerful for me to have said, "I do deserve.... because I have earned it."

I appreciate you being kind despite my choice of words :)

3HatsComm 803 pts

DanielleSmithTV I know you picked up on her term, have not objection to your choice of words. But it's not semantics with me.

I've struggled getting ahead and when I came out of college, I was naive enough to think that all I had to do to succeed was be myself, be smart, work hard, do a great job and that would earn me all the promotions, success, fame, millions in a numbered bank account. How little I knew. ;-) Again just entitlement vs. merit, rewards given vs. rewards earned.

The irony is that this "Sarah" seems to feel more entitled, she begrudges bloggers what rewards they've earned, feels slighted and that she deserves to be paid more than they do just because she thinks more highly of her job title. Just thinking..

MarkDykeman 12 pts

Gonna go contrarian here. I think there's an important point that "Sarah"'s post brought up that got lost in the execution and the reaction. There's been a huge number of opinions shared on the whole concept of "deserving", whether it's being deserving of being paid for working with a PR agency to promote a product, to getting free samples, to... whatever type of award that people are looking for.

Yes, some people seem to be showered with gifts, perks, even $$$$ to promote stuff. I think that "Sarah" was right in noting that there isn't always going to be a budget to reward the bloggers who promote stuff for them. As long as that is known up front, it's fair game.

As flawed as metrics may be, a PR firm is only going to want to invest time and money into someone who will (and can) do a good job of spreading the word to the desired audience. Many bloggers won't have been able to build this kind of audience. I know that in my case, my book reviews won't have the same reach as Chris Brogan's and I don't expect anyone to shower me free books (although there are a few people out there who do send me books for review, for which I'm grateful).

The real audience of "Sarah's" article, I think, was the (possibly) growing group of bloggers who are practically demanding compensation and perks, yet they haven't put in the time, created the content, built the relationships or the audience to be the type of person that a PR firm would target to help spread the word. I realize that this is a polarizing example, but there have been stories (largely apocryphal? I don't know) of various bloggers who have been "caught" demanding extravagant perks just because they see other people getting them. Some of the stories that stick in my mind have to do with the "mommy bloggers" segment, but I personally think that there might be a vocal, very small number of people who may be suffering from an enlarged sense of entitlement. I'm sure it happens in other segments, too. Most bloggers, I think, are pretty reasonable about most things, but there are always people who are more concerned about personal gain than serving their audiences.

Also, there's the whole pay issue that both "Sarah" and Danielle have referenced. My feeling? If you are a professional (blogger, consultant, etc.) then you need to be running things like a business and ensuring that compensation is a negotiated, agreed upon item. If money has to be involved, sort that out as a part of the due diligence. If you're not happy with the deal that's being offered, if any, then you always have the option to walk away.

I'm sorry if Danielle and other folks felt that they were being slighted by "Sarah"'s post, but if you've got your shit together, then I don't think "Sarah" was talking to you. "Sarah" could have done a better job at making her point, but I don't think she was entirely wrong.

3HatsComm 803 pts

MarkDykeman Mark, My take on the tone of the article was that "Sarah" was talking out of both sides of her mouth. While mentioning the power of an "A-list" she was sorta saying it didn't exist, that bloggers are by default not working, non-professionals who haven't done anything to merit compensation. She didn't single out those who do have their shit together vs. the bad apples; she seemed to lump all bloggers into a stay-at-home, slacker category .. even those who work in other fields and also blog. I get the bad bloggers, attitudes and positions that the rant was supposed to be about, but it was overgeneralized as Shonali mentioned last week. JMO.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

MarkDykeman Mark - contrarian is always welcome :) Though I have to say I really didn't find you to be so.... I agree with most everything you said - I just honestly didn't address each of those points in the post. Yes - there has absolutely been MUCH discussion (and many instances I am aware of) in regards to the 'entitlement factor'. I think my only reference to that was to say that I don't 'deserve' anything based on what anyone else gets and/or does. If I see someone getting a trip, a stove, a consulting job.... I most definitely do not feel entitled to that same perk or position. I'm hopeful that the relationships I've forged and the work I have done has come my way based on the merit of what I provide (meaning I've earned it).

Also - you make a good point - Agencies and Brands may not always have the budget to promote a product and as long as both parties involved know the plan, and agree - that is fine.

You are right - Sarah may have been directing her post at a specific segment of bloggers. However, the audience of that particular magazine - newly created by Jennifer James - is not aimed solely at a new contingency - but equally at bloggers who have their 'stuff' together :)

Thank you for the conversation.

keithprivette 49 pts

I think careful analysis needs to be done on both sides. Is company just trying to get impressions to fuel the sales side (if they did the analysis how correct trackable marketing and advertising can do this). Has the blogger looked at their schedule and work items to do and can give the proper engagement to the company. These are B2B relations and should be treated as such. Both companies leveraging each other to make money! Well some cases raise awareness, but I don't think this is the point Sarah and Danielle are making.

I have seen this tactic as a "poke the tiger" and generate visibility to fuel the other side of the house of making money. Not bad, but it has to be skillfully and artistically pulled off. Danielle you may be right funny when it needs to be serious this is not pulling off the "poke the tiger" tactic. Now there is a discussion here that within the B2B relation operates differently than the B2C relationship and some bloggers need to be educated to the fact that B2B hopefully both parties win. Where if the blogger is in it for free stuff and does not give in return it is a win lose and the B2B is doomed. Now that is the serious discussion that needs to happen. I do believe some bloggers or influencers come into the ring wanting theirs! Wrong approach by them.

Danielle way to present a constructive discussion approach! New follower as of this post, so I am looking forward to more stuff!!!

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

keithprivette Keith - I appreciate the kind words. Yes - if the blogger is just in it for free stuff and doesn't do anything to warrant (or deserve :) the trust of the brand and/or PR agency - then, absolutely, the relationship is doomed AND that Agency/Brand is left with a bad taste in their mouth. And if it is just this type of experience that motivated Sarah's post - I can understand her frustration - however - the overall characterization of bloggers as undeserving is what I found disappointing. 'Bloggers' aren't the same, any more than Agencies or Brands can be grouped based on some of the poor or stellar outreach I have seen. Thank you for furthering the conversation....

mikeashworth 20 pts

you may be deserving, it is very possible, i dont know you or your work so cant really comment on that. what i can comment on though is your response to this other person. you've lowered yourself to a level i dont think you should have gone to by responding in such a way. rise above it, keep calm and carry on doing what you are doing, if someone doesn't have time for what you do, fine, let them pass and carry on with whatever they were doing. we only have so much energy to expend on activities in our life. choose those that bring the most amount of positivity to what you do. i do not believe this is one of them. in all honesty, this post comes across as very "woe is me" and "self pitying" and i bet that's now what you intended at all.

DannyBrown 2707 pts

mikeashworth To be fair, Mike, I asked Danielle if she wished to guest post (from a comment on the post I'd written about Sarah's original post). I'd disagree that the post comes across as "woe is me", and more "I'm proud of what I do and so should other bloggers", who were cast as undeserving in the original post over at Mom Magazine.

To be honest, I'd probably write a similar post if Danielle hadn't. Too often, we're told "just move on, be the bigger person". That works - to a degree. Because if we don't share how we really feel, how do we learn?

Cheers, sir! :)

mikeashworth 20 pts

DannyBrown i still think that in the big scheme of things, does the person she is complaining about really matter? i think not, focus on people who do, give them your time and energy, not those who would seek to diss you. if it hadnt had the emphasised words "shouting" and other such stuff perhaps i may not have come to a different conclusion.

DannyBrown 2707 pts

mikeashworth When the person works at an agency that deals with bloggers as part of their offerings, and shares a view that basically says these same bloggers are over-valued... Yes, I think in the big scheme of things it matters. Who knows, posts and viewpoints might help either Sarah or her agency understand bloggers and their roles better. And that's a win for them and their clients, no?

3HatsComm 803 pts

mikeashworth DannyBrown I get what you're saying, and some things should not matter Mike. And yet, if we keep silent and do nothing, that's how the other side "wins." That's what let bad practices or such attitudes grow and IMO misguide others. IDK.. I'm not for sinking to someone's level or whining, but I am for standing up or calling out what you think someone's got it wrong. FWIW.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

mikeashworth Hey Mike - first of all - what would life be if everyone agreed? I truly had no intention of coming across as 'woe as me' or 'self-pitying'. As I mentioned in the post and in a comment below, I'm not easily offended and do tend to steer clear of polarizing conversations, but sometimes I do think it is important to raise your hand when you disagree with something. This is one of those times. I'm hopeful that much of the conversation - both within the comment section surrounding Sarah's post and what Danny has spurred on here - is helpful to people on both sides of this discussion. Just as it is important for me to realize there are people who think, "Danielle, calm down....no big deal.", I'm hopeful, someone will read it and recognize that there might be value in my words. Thank you, Mike, for making me think.

JonHearty 133 pts

DanielleSmithTV thanks for the post! As a rather non-confrontational person I also tend to steer clear from conversations like this. Unfortunately with that attitude comes the bottling up of words that must eventually be spoken. I think you picked the right battle here with this post and I'm glad you and dannybrown are willing to publicly dissent. Right or wrong doesn't really matter; I'm just glad to see a few people give their honest, passionate opinions. Just added you on Twitter, danniellesmithtv , looking forward to more of your input!

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

JonHearty dannybrown danniellesmithtv Jon, I really appreciate that - there is no doubt that people will disagree with either me or with Sarah - or maybe both of us on some level - but I am grateful to Danny for the chance to voice my opinion.

DannyBrown 2707 pts

DanielleSmithTV JonHearty Maybe I should start a Ustream Debate Channel ;-)

m2ky 25 pts

Hi Danielle,

You, and every blogger, that shares insight, knowledge, and opinion "deserves." I remember when knowledge and information was only available for a price. Whether it was currency, trade, or social capital at the lunch counter, there was a price. Now, via the blogosphere, I have access to what feels like unlimited information and analysis. It's my responsibility to decide what's useful, valid, and I should pursue but that's a different type of price (and that overhead has always existed.)

So what once had a price, is now available on my schedule whenever I want it via yours and other bloggers hard work. You deserve to be compensated for your contribution to that value. Regardless of whether you choose to do something else tomorrow or decide to do it from office.

Oh, and by the way, thank you :)

DannyBrown 2707 pts

m2ky It's been interesting to see how people and businesses adapt to the freemium model of information online, Mike. Google's made it easy to find anything you want to know about, Wikipedia has pretty much all the answers, and bloggers are offering years of accumulated expertise and knowledge for free.

Like you say, makes sense you should be compensated for doing what is (essentially) still your job.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

m2ky I appreciate your perspective.... the information overload online is available for the taking, but whether someone decides to cull through that content (on their own dime/time as you point out) or request something new and specific is up to them... Thank you for reading and commenting!

TrafficColeman 38 pts

Danielle..I will to say join the band wagon, because sometimes we all fill like we are not deserving enough. Personally I think its just an way of life. People get caught up and their own troubles and just forget about you and your hard work...but its always going be brighter days..

"Black Seo Guy "Signing Off"

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

TrafficColeman Couldn't agree with you more - there will always be brighter days - and really - in terms of 'troubles' this is small potatoes, but I'm grateful for the chance to talk about it.

barrykahan 20 pts

I understand your need to respond to an attack. Sarah has some envy going on. Nothing gets to someone more than just ignoring them though. Almost like flicking a fly off your shoulder. Insignificant. The fact that you have been singled out, makes you VERY significant. All can get along much better if we remember the adage, "Be slow to critisize and quick to praise."

DannyBrown 2707 pts

barrykahan Hey there Barry,

I think Danielle's post is more a generic overview (obviously it reflects what she does), as she wasn't singled out personally (although the "undeserving" part definitely includes her skillsets and niche).

As I mention to mikeashworth above, for sure, often we should (and do) ignore and move on. But sometimes sharing your viewpoint can also get to someone, but in a better way, because they might see why they're coming under fire themselves?

barrykahan 20 pts

DannyBrown mikeashworth Hey Danny, I agree with you. Although the perfect thing to do is ignore, I myself am not sure I wouldn't not have come back with more guns blazing ;) . I was alluding more towards the author of the original post then Danielle as far as to my quote.

DanielleSmithTV 23 pts

barrykahan Hey Barry - I agree with you - 'quick to praise' is always the best option....Honestly, I usually observe these discussions from the sidelines, but this time, just really felt a twinge as I read the original article - (that's why I commented on Danny's post about it too!) I do know Sarah definitely wasn't talking to 'me' - but think her collective grouping of bloggers as undeserving was something I wanted to address. Thank you for letting me do it :)