Why Tech Already Has Women (And Why They’re Better Than Arrington)



Women in tech better than Michael Arrington

Contrary to Violet Blue’s disappointing stance about women in tech in 2010, this year saw a terrible new trend, the outright enforcement of the glass ceiling in technology.

First there was Michael Arrington’s terribly ignorant rant, followed verbally by the likes of Robert Scoble and Ms. Blue, as well as the visual use of boobs to sell copies of WIRED by Chris Anderson and crew.

Before opining too much, here are some statistics for you (the first three were originally cited by Allyson Kapin in F@st Company):

  • Women-run tech startups generate more revenue per invested capital and fail less then those led by men, according to New York Entrepreneur Week.
  • “Companies, including information technology, with the highest percentages of women board directors outperformed those with the least by 66%,” according to research by Catalyst.
  • “Gender diversity [is] particularly valuable where innovation is key,” according to studies by Illuminate Ventures.

In spite of the statistical advantages of women in tech, negative trends towards male speakers and executive leadership continue. Worse, reading this negative enforcement of sexism in tech has been a damn shame.

Working with great women in tech — Susan Murphy, Beth Kanter, Kami Huyse, Allyson Kapin, Amber MacArthur, Sarah Prevette, Lisa Kalandjian and Cali Lewis to name a few this year — has been a phenomenal experience for both of us, and they demonstrate every day how brilliant and capable they are.

In fact, these women are better than the likes of Arrington and crew, because they would never allow themselves to demean an entire race, gender or religious sect of people on the Internet. Even if they had such feelings (which we doubt), they would rise above this kind of baseless attack to offer solutions.

Then again, perhaps that shouldn’t come across as too surprising. TechCrunch is hardly the purveyor of common sense and good “fights,” as they’ve shown continuously in the past with their attacks on PR, CEO’s, bloggers — basically anyone who doesn’t bow to Arrington’s missives.

There are certainly issues for women, as pointed out by Allyson Kapin in the above articles as well as many other women who discuss this issue. Men have a role in it, too, as evidenced by this year’s newest glass blowing experiences. Moving forward, men need to be more active about providing solutions to create a more level playing field. For example:

  • Actively support women in business, both through choices of partners, vendors and employees, and in promotion.
  • Stop trashing and reacting to women trying to succeed. Rather than get into throw downs about how women create their own problems in tech — or worse revert to past bad practices like conferences for men — work to create an inclusive balanced playing field for every human being.
  • If you are a man and you don’t like these types of actions against women — posts, magazine articles, speaking rosters — say something. When both genders actively voice dissatisfaction in this matter, it becomes a powerful statement.
  • Instead of supporting old structures for speaking — such as soliciting speaking submissions from chest beating male A-Listers — build an editorial mission for the conference, and seek out great male and female speakers beyond the comfortable and immediate social network.
  • Stop thinking with the mindset that “women” and “success” are two words that — together — are news, and start thinking it’s the norm.
  • Think of the challenges your great-grandmother, grandmother and (possibly) your mother went through to be someone. Then ask if you’d want that still, and add your wife or daughter into the mix. Would you want them to be viewed as “unique” because of their industry choice? And that’s “unique” in a negative way, not in a good one-of-a-kind way.

To be fair, this isn’t an isolated issue with the technology sector. Think of a lot of industries, and you’ll find that women are often viewed as second-best to their male counterparts. They may have won the vote but it’s clear that women still trail men when it comes to advancement, recognition and financial reward compared to their male peers in too many industries.

But it’s even more evident in the technology sector, where too many geek overlords want to keep the sandpit for themselves, and maybe the women can solder a chip or connect a conference call between the male kingfishers.

And it’s just plain stupid. For every Michael Arrington there’s a Bindi Karia; for every Robert Scoble, there’s a Gina Trapani; for every Chris Anderson there’s a Stephanie Agresta. And with new innovators being sponsored to come through from India, and developing countries making women and technology one of their key focuses, these names (and others like them) will only be added to.

Frankly, an argument can be made that most of the modern gender imbalance issues are rooted in men not consciously looking for great women, as opposed to them not existing. 2011 can be a year where forward progress can be made — by both women and men. Let’s hope the community joins together in working towards that goal.

Given how great women are in business, why wouldn’t you?

Geoff Livingston is the co-founder of Zoetica, serving nonprofits and socially conscious companies with top-tier, word-of-mouth communication services. A social change agent, Geoff is the author of Now Is Gone and the forthcoming book Welcome to the Fifth Estate.

“UPDATE: Robert Scoble believes our comments are taken out of context, and has offered this Cincast on his views about women in tech. We appreciate Mr. Scoble’s participation in this important topic, and wish to encourage all parties to discuss the matter.”

“UPDATE: Robert Scoble has shared his thoughts on Women in Tech over at Geoff’s blog. You can view his take here.”

image: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com

Get my latest posts straight to your inbox!


DannyBrown.me runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Framework

Genesis empowers you to quickly and easily build amazing websites with WordPress.

Whether you're new to WordPress or an advanced developer, Genesis provides the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go. It's that simple - start using Genesis now!


Genesis comes with 6 default layout options, comprehensive SEO settings, rock-solid security, flexible theme options, cool custom widgets, custom design hooks, and a huge selection of child themes ("skins") that make your site look the way you want it to. With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I have to say I get where Violet is coming from on this, and I think Jenna would agree. Those of us who have been working in tech for years are tired of listening to the whining. It doesn't do any good.

What we do need is for women to stand up and ASK for better roles, speaking gigs and a place at the table. For whatever reason that's not what happens and until it does we are stuck here.

I posted about this in August last year ( http://janetfouts.com/women-social-media/ )and although there have been efforts made on several levels to increase the number of women speaking it still falls on the women themselves to step up.

All that said, I for one appreciate the open support of both of you, thanks for the post and the discussion.

I think the problem is, sometimes women do stand up and ask, Janet, but they still get ignored or, worse still, get put on a panel where they're basically hijacked.

Here's hoping more come through like you, Jenna and others, and the proper respect and opportunities get offered without needing to ask. :)

Janet: Certainly, many complex sides to this issue and women standing up and asserting themselves is important. Violet's point in the end got to that, but her methodology in said post was more detrimental to the effort than useful, IMO. But, then again it inspired this post so perhaps it did succeed in it's own right. Thanks for your support and keep fighting the fight!

On Danny Boy, I love ya.

I don't work in the tech field but am interested in women's issues and had read Arrington's post. His post made me read the original post that sparked his writing and I didn't see it blaming men for difficulties women have in the tech field; it just seemed to me to be asking for support by men. So I was going to make that comment on Arrington's post but never did because I read the prior comments - there was some ugly vitriol. It was primarily by men, but there were a couple of women who engaged in an ugly manner with the men. Two things I thought:
1. I'm not commenting here.
2. There are some men who are REALLY angry with & even hate women. I hoped that they did not represent the norm.

So thanks again for your post and for being direct and polite. Cherry

Hi there Cherry,

Oh yes, the mature TechCrunch comment base... ;-)

Actually, not all are bad, just a fair few. One of the reasons I stopped reading it a while back - like you say, there's a fair old bit of hate in there at times...

women nowadays are adopting the technology and many of them can also contributes towards business, they also want to prove that gender is not a hindrance.

Danny and Geoff, thank you for the bold, honest post and foster an intelligent dialogue about the issue. I believe we need to acknowledge & support the great advancements in tech and give props to the many talented & visionary women who are helping to fuel the growth & innovation you mentioned. Their successes are good for all of us.

Sadly, there does exist a sort of 'boys club' who seem to prefer their own voices and camaraderie (but we can't let that deter nor distract). Thankfully, there are men & women who all of this is a non-issue and amazing work can be done in those collaborations. If we've learned nothing else, things shift quickly in tech and none of us can afford to be myopic in viewpt. Thanks for recognizing all the female tech entrepreneurs blazing trails and continuing to see the goal (not the obstacles).

This is a great post, Danny, complete with tons of research and references. It makes me happy to see someone stand up and objectively talk about the milestones we're hitting in the quest for gender equality rather than just adding to a list of "me too" posts about why it's important.

I did want to probe further on your statement of avoiding "reverting to past bad practices like conferences for men." Why is a conference for men such a bad thing?

Regardless of industry, we often tend to automatically equate the male gender with misogeny, essentially demonizing all men in the process of achieving equality for women. We don't have the constructive conversations about what we as men can do to advance our own gender because it's viewed as a zero sum game. Advancing men means oppressing women.

But this is a false logic. Just as it is important for women to examine and address classic issues like the glass ceiling, we men should be gathering and asking ourselves why women out-pace us in social media usage, college enrollment and graduation rates.

Men gathering with this intent in mind would be a positive and beneficial addition to the gender equality cause. Only in fully exploring our respective genders can we come together and create a world that embraces both.

I would argue the ultimate goal is to have neither men's nor women's professional conferences, just conferences. I find when the pendulum swings one way or another, it's not a healthy conversation. That being said, happy to play a good game of basketball with the fellas any day.

Bravo Gents,

This whole notion has really taken center stage of late, with the mass sharing of Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg's TED talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/sheryl_sandberg_why_we_have_too_few_women_leaders.html) last week.

With conferences, I would love to see some new blood and perhaps do a blind submission. Where the concept was what the talk was based on, not the social credentials, company or gender involved. I think that there are tons of smart folks who do not get there say across industries because they are lacking some sort of real or perceived clout.

Calling attention to the glass ceiling does not change the problem, it only sheds more light on it without offering a fix.

I don't have the exact means to fix it but think that we should start looking at things more broad based (no pun intended) with a universal outlook for a greater benefit all around.

Think about the past three conferences or networking events you attended. Who made the most memorable impact?

For me, the best conversations and biggest takeaways have been from super smart women and would place a bet that you have had a similar experience.

Well said, Jeff. I agree, a major shake up in the way speaker line-ups are determined would go far towards resolving this problem.

Thank you Danny and Geoff! On a much smaller scale I have been doing many posts via twitter and comments on blogs talking about this very subject. More locally than anything. Ever since having a daughter the world seems much different in my perspective which is a good thing!

This is probably one of the most important point "If you are a man and you don’t like these types of actions against women — posts, magazine articles, speaking rosters — say something!" Woman will need fellas in our crusade for human being equality. Men can be really good blockers & tacklers when need be!

And according to the first set of bullet points you lay out....isn't common sense that we all move forward with woman at the helm or at least as equals in the journey!

That's good stuff, Keith. Please let me know when you have something up, I'd love to help you with it, see it. In addition to my two business partners, I also have a daughter, and want her to have every opportunity she deserves (if she should choose to accept them).

I will do so! I tend to promote many events and blog posts locally to MSP...which is acting locally but thinking globally! Well I think it its....Daughters rock every dude needs to have one! Now when they are are 16 to 25 maybe not so much, but I have to remember "Keep Calm and Carry On" right....oh and maybe have a loaded shotgun in the gun case...kidding

Can I comment late? Well Griddy had this in her posts of the week. And I saw a dash of this on David Spinks blog. I am not in Tech. But I came from high science. I used to work on Rocket, Missile, Automotive, Medical high technology programs where very few women worked. Its why I left and came to Advertising. My first meeting at a big media buying agency in NYC was mostly women. And one even had a whole arm tattooed in a sleeve. I was stoked! But tech....there is male arrogance. and it is a shame. 3 of 5 PhDs in the US go to women now. They will take over. But people in power aka Male oppression of women will take a long time to be over come.

As for Arrington? Michael Arrington is a big phat cry baby. I have no respect for him. I base this on his writings. He cries. He whines. So a man who has no self confidence, is catty and way too much vanity of course is not going to be a proper evolved human when it comes to women in tech.

I think you sum it up perfectly with the term "arrogance", Howie. Often people get carried away by success, and forget the people that got them there.

Pretty sure that the successful guys in tech (or any other industry) had some great and brilliant women working alongside them on the way. And yet as soon as success kicks in, they're the dogs bollocks and everyone else is crud.

Oh well...

The instant I saw this blog post title, I thought of Katie Stanton's Twitter list of women in tech: http://twitter.com/#!/KatieS/womenintech

The women of that list prove the power of women and the amazing stuff they do.

Cheers for that link, Ari - agreed, great list and perfect response to anyone who thinks women don't have a place in tech.

I have to say I get where Violet is coming from on this, and I think Jenna would agree. Those of us who have been working in tech for years are tired of listening to the whining. It doesn't do any good.

What we do need is for women to stand up and ASK for better roles, speaking gigs and a place at the table. For whatever reason that's not what happens and until it does we are stuck here.

I posted about this in August last year ( http://janetfouts.com/women-social-media/ )and although there have been efforts made on several levels to increase the number of women speaking it still falls on the women themselves to step up.

All that said, I for one appreciate the open support of both of you, thanks for the post and the discussion.

I think the problem is, sometimes women do stand up and ask, Janet, but they still get ignored or, worse still, get put on a panel where they're basically hijacked.

Here's hoping more come through like you, Jenna and others, and the proper respect and opportunities get offered without needing to ask. :)

Janet: Certainly, many complex sides to this issue and women standing up and asserting themselves is important. Violet's point in the end got to that, but her methodology in said post was more detrimental to the effort than useful, IMO. But, then again it inspired this post so perhaps it did succeed in it's own right. Thanks for your support and keep fighting the fight!

On Danny Boy, I love ya.

I don't work in the tech field but am interested in women's issues and had read Arrington's post. His post made me read the original post that sparked his writing and I didn't see it blaming men for difficulties women have in the tech field; it just seemed to me to be asking for support by men. So I was going to make that comment on Arrington's post but never did because I read the prior comments - there was some ugly vitriol. It was primarily by men, but there were a couple of women who engaged in an ugly manner with the men. Two things I thought:
1. I'm not commenting here.
2. There are some men who are REALLY angry with & even hate women. I hoped that they did not represent the norm.

So thanks again for your post and for being direct and polite. Cherry

Hi there Cherry,

Oh yes, the mature TechCrunch comment base... ;-)

Actually, not all are bad, just a fair few. One of the reasons I stopped reading it a while back - like you say, there's a fair old bit of hate in there at times...

Yes, his original post may have simply been chum for the readers.

women nowadays are adopting the technology and many of them can also contributes towards business, they also want to prove that gender is not a hindrance.

Thing is, gender should never be a hindrance (for either sex). Except maybe for childbirth... ;-)

Danny and Geoff, thank you for the bold, honest post and foster an intelligent dialogue about the issue. I believe we need to acknowledge & support the great advancements in tech and give props to the many talented & visionary women who are helping to fuel the growth & innovation you mentioned. Their successes are good for all of us.

Sadly, there does exist a sort of 'boys club' who seem to prefer their own voices and camaraderie (but we can't let that deter nor distract). Thankfully, there are men & women who all of this is a non-issue and amazing work can be done in those collaborations. If we've learned nothing else, things shift quickly in tech and none of us can afford to be myopic in viewpt. Thanks for recognizing all the female tech entrepreneurs blazing trails and continuing to see the goal (not the obstacles).

Hey there Rayna,

I love this sentence in particular (from a solid-as-usual comment):

"Thanks for recognizing all the female tech entrepreneurs blazing trails and continuing to see the goal (not the obstacles)."

I think if everyone starts looking at possibilities as goals and not obstacles, then we'll be in a much better place, period.

Obstacles are simply stepping stones to the solution. Get rid of them, get rid of the problem. And the best way to do that? Don't look at them as obstacles to start with.

Thanks, miss!

Good points here, and something to consider in my own rants, er, posts.

This is a great post, Danny, complete with tons of research and references. It makes me happy to see someone stand up and objectively talk about the milestones we're hitting in the quest for gender equality rather than just adding to a list of "me too" posts about why it's important.

I did want to probe further on your statement of avoiding "reverting to past bad practices like conferences for men." Why is a conference for men such a bad thing?

Regardless of industry, we often tend to automatically equate the male gender with misogeny, essentially demonizing all men in the process of achieving equality for women. We don't have the constructive conversations about what we as men can do to advance our own gender because it's viewed as a zero sum game. Advancing men means oppressing women.

But this is a false logic. Just as it is important for women to examine and address classic issues like the glass ceiling, we men should be gathering and asking ourselves why women out-pace us in social media usage, college enrollment and graduation rates.

Men gathering with this intent in mind would be a positive and beneficial addition to the gender equality cause. Only in fully exploring our respective genders can we come together and create a world that embraces both.

I would argue the ultimate goal is to have neither men's nor women's professional conferences, just conferences. I find when the pendulum swings one way or another, it's not a healthy conversation. That being said, happy to play a good game of basketball with the fellas any day.

I'd echo Geoff's reply, Josh - is there really a need for a single sex-only conference on anything anymore? Why not make it a uniformed conference so everyone can learn, and those "ahead" can really help educated those being left behind on what they need to do, as opposed to a belief on what's needed from a skewed audience?

Geoff and Danny,
Not sure I'm with you all the way there. To create single sex-only conferences would mean abolishing the already-established women's conferences.

Plus, I think there are issues and challenges facing each gender that are not solved, but become more awkward and pronounced. I'm reminded of a Twin Cities women's event about a year ago called She's Geeky in which much drama ensued because there was a mixed panel talking about the women in tech issue. A few men went on extended rants about what women should do. While well-intentioned, this wasn't really helpful nor was it well received.

So while I like your suggestion, I'm not sure it's practical. Maybe I'm missing the grand vision though. What would be the perfect venue for both men and women to acknowledge and work together to identify and address gender issues?

Perhaps the issues becoming pronounced will encourage them to be dealt with better, Josh, as opposed to the current examples we see so often (much like the one you share)?

Making errors of judgement are often the best way forward to a resolution - did the women (or other men) explain why the "rants" weren't helpful? Or offer some ways the conversation could move forward? Or was there just more complaining about non-understanding?

Perhaps something like BlogHer or Daddy Blogger conferences (I think there's one, but I can't recall the name) should still be separate. Though would that mean that speakers could only be men or women, or sponsors could only be men or women?

It's not an easy question with easy answers, but I honestly believe that a discussion between both sexes at the same conferences would be more productive than a single-sex discussion where possible solutions then have to be presented to the other sex to discuss.

Geoff and Danny,
Not sure I'm with you all the way there. To create single sex-only conferences would mean abolishing the already-established women's conferences.

Plus, I think there are issues and challenges facing each gender that are not solved, but become more awkward and pronounced. I'm reminded of a Twin Cities women's event about a year ago called She's Geeky in which much drama ensued because there was a mixed panel talking about the women in tech issue. A few men went on extended rants about what women should do. While well-intentioned, this wasn't really helpful nor was it well received.

So while I like your suggestion, I'm not sure it's practical. Maybe I'm missing the grand vision though. What would be the perfect venue for both men and women to acknowledge and work together to identify and address gender issues?

Bravo Gents,

This whole notion has really taken center stage of late, with the mass sharing of Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg's TED talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/sheryl_sandberg_why_we_have_too_few_women_leaders.html) last week.

With conferences, I would love to see some new blood and perhaps do a blind submission. Where the concept was what the talk was based on, not the social credentials, company or gender involved. I think that there are tons of smart folks who do not get there say across industries because they are lacking some sort of real or perceived clout.

Calling attention to the glass ceiling does not change the problem, it only sheds more light on it without offering a fix.

I don't have the exact means to fix it but think that we should start looking at things more broad based (no pun intended) with a universal outlook for a greater benefit all around.

Think about the past three conferences or networking events you attended. Who made the most memorable impact?

For me, the best conversations and biggest takeaways have been from super smart women and would place a bet that you have had a similar experience.

Well said, Jeff. I agree, a major shake up in the way speaker line-ups are determined would go far towards resolving this problem.

Geoff it would be nice but you know that won't happen as everyone wants the heavy hitters, but to be honest some of the more moving presentations have been from women.

You know my biggest disappointment, Jeff (and Geoff)? The fact that something like SxSW could have amazing conference, but then the voting panels pick their friends. I met one of the panel pickers earlier this year, and he confirmed my belief it's not what you know, but who. Though I shouldn't have been surprised, considering he wasn't the most impressive of people anyhoo...

I recently watched the TED Talk by Sheryl Sandberg, and I was so incredibly moved. It made me realize that the fact that I was a tomboy as a kid has helped me get to where I am today, because I'm not afraid to sit at the table. I have a lot to learn from her, as to many other women and men for that matter.

While I think blind submissions is one way we can get more women speakers, I think a lot of the problem is the lack of women that apply in the first place. Whether it is a lack of confidence or even promotion about the gig, we need to get more women involved from the start. We have the chops that men have, we just need to get ourselves out there more - myself included.

Good point, Jenna, though it could be the chicken and egg syndrome. Are women not submitting because they have nothing to say, or because they feel it'd be pointless because they'd be passed over for a guy?

I know which one my money's on... ;-)

Women usually say yes to speaking opps when they are asked, just my experience. Thus lending support to the egg, not the chicken!

Good point, Jenna, though it could be the chicken and egg syndrome. Are women not submitting because they have nothing to say, or because they feel it'd be pointless because they'd be passed over for a guy?

I know which one my money's on... ;-)

Thank you Danny and Geoff! On a much smaller scale I have been doing many posts via twitter and comments on blogs talking about this very subject. More locally than anything. Ever since having a daughter the world seems much different in my perspective which is a good thing!

This is probably one of the most important point "If you are a man and you don’t like these types of actions against women — posts, magazine articles, speaking rosters — say something!" Woman will need fellas in our crusade for human being equality. Men can be really good blockers & tacklers when need be!

And according to the first set of bullet points you lay out....isn't common sense that we all move forward with woman at the helm or at least as equals in the journey!

That's good stuff, Keith. Please let me know when you have something up, I'd love to help you with it, see it. In addition to my two business partners, I also have a daughter, and want her to have every opportunity she deserves (if she should choose to accept them).

I will do so! I tend to promote many events and blog posts locally to MSP...which is acting locally but thinking globally! Well I think it its....Daughters rock every dude needs to have one! Now when they are are 16 to 25 maybe not so much, but I have to remember "Keep Calm and Carry On" right....oh and maybe have a loaded shotgun in the gun case...kidding

That's the biggest thing, Keith - so many people stay silent, when social media gives everyone a huge voice with which to make their feelings clear, and join others in doing so.

If we had more folks like you, we wouldn't need posts like this. Cheers for all you do, sir.

I have a feeling 2011 will be the year of the Human Being....nothing but a gut feel. I think I am going to sign up for a bunch of 1 or 2 conference in MSP usually dedicated to woman, to get a new perspective....do you think they will accept me?

I'll loan you my kilt if it helps ;-)

I have a feeling 2011 will be the year of the Human Being....nothing but a gut feel. I think I am going to sign up for a bunch of 1 or 2 conference in MSP usually dedicated to woman, to get a new perspective....do you think they will accept me?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] by Danny Brown and Geoff Livingston (Cross posted on Danny’s blog) [...]

  2. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Meryl at Beanstalk, jeffespo, Rob and others. Rob said: Great post from @DannyBrown hope 2011 is better http://dannybrown.me/2010/12/29/women-are-not-techs-bitches/ [...]

  3. [...] Why Tech Already Has Women And They’re Better Than Arrington | Danny Brown [...]

  4. [...] Why Tech Already Has Women (And Why They’re Better Than Arrington) – This is a great post from Danny Brown and Geoff Livingston. They really hit home on a sensitive topic in many industries now. I think that a good solution would be to make submissions for concepts blind and based upon the merits of the case, not the gender, company or credo. Definitely give this and the comments a good read. [...]

  5. [...] Why Tech Already Has Women (And Why They’re Better Than Arrington) – by Geoff Livingston and Danny Brown, dannybrown.me [...]

  6. [...] up from the joint blog post, “Why Tech Already Has Women…” co-authored with Danny Brown, noted tech blogger Robert Scoble felt the critical remarks in the post were unfair. After [...]

  7. [...] business. “Following up from the joint blog post, “Why Tech Already Has Women…” co-authored with Danny Brown, noted tech blogger Robert Scoble felt the critical remarks in the post were unfair. After [...]

  8. [...] opportunities for reflection, and even opportunities for practicing new skills.Danny Brown – Why Tech Already Has Women (And Why They’re Better Than Arrington)Instead of supporting old structures for speaking — such as soliciting speaking submissions from [...]

  9. [...] this year, Geoff Livingston and myself shared a post on the state of women in the tech industry, and why/how the situation could [...]

  10. [...] this year, Geoff Livingston and myself common a post on a state of women in a tech industry, and why/how a conditions could [...]

  11. [...] business. “Following up from the joint blog post, “Why Tech Already Has Women…” co-authored with Danny Brown, noted tech blogger Robert Scoble felt the critical remarks in the post were unfair. After [...]