Protecting Your Assets

0 Shares 0 Shares ×

Assets and growth

My friend and business partner Troy Claus wrote an interesting post the other day, looking at personal versus professional branding. It raises some great questions about focus and recognition, and where the value lies in both.

It got me thinking about how the line between figureheads and financial results in business can be a frail one, and how companies need to take a look at how their audience perceives them if they want long-term success.

It’s a question that not too many businesses look at, especially if the employee is either a founder or boardroom level. Yet it’s something that every business needs to be aware of, and not just at the highest level.

One Minus One Equals…

Look at Apple and Microsoft for a minute. Everyone knows who the number one employee is (or was) – Steve Jobs and Bill Gates respectively. They’ve become the face of their companies and are synonymous with the two brands.

Yet for anyone outside the tech and associated arenas, could you say who’s immediately after these guys? Timothy D. Cook is the Chief Operating Officer for Apple and Steve Ballmer is the CEO of Microsoft. I know of Ballmer, but that’s purely from being an Xbox 360 owner and his name pops up a lot in that field, but Cook I didn’t know.

This is why there’s always a big reaction to any news about Steve Jobs’ health – most people (or at least the ones that really matter, the consumers) see Jobs as Apple and vice versa. All of Apple’s successes have been because of Jobs (again, in the eyes of the general consumer), so no Jobs means no Apple.

You only have to look at the way Apple’s share price dropped when a citizen journalist incorrectly reported on Jobs’ death. While the story was criticized for lack of research, it did raise a valuable point – is being the face of a company detrimental to your overall business strategy?

Strength in Numbers

There are two key factors in the success of a business – customers and product. Sure, you can have the best personnel but without customers it doesn’t matter if you have the most kick-ass team in business history. While market forces and economy also play a part, it’s customers and product that go hand-in-hand with each other that either make or break a business.

Normally they won’t care who’s running a company – all that matters is they can get a product they need at the price they want to pay. However, if they see a front person for that company, it’s natural to associate that person as the company itself. So if something happens to that person, it’s also natural to think the company will be affected. Which is what’s happened with Apple in the past, despite the fact they have a tremendous backroom team in place to steady the ship.

If you have a face to your business, ask yourself if it’s the best approach. It’s always good to be recognizable as a brand but can there be too much recognition?

  • Make your business the brand as opposed to having a figurehead. These are usually only good for shareholders and investors, and they don’t normally stick around too long when your customer base starts disappearing.
  • Spread the love. Businesses with just one or two key personnel are always at risk from one or both of them leaving. Where does that leave the business? Encourage others to step up and reward innovation across the company with increased responsibilities.
  • Talk to your customers. Keep them up-to-date with current events behind-the-scenes ahead of announcements and help head off speculation before it happens.
  • Build the confidence that your business isn’t just a one-man show. If there are public trade shows, send multiple employees to deliver keynote speeches in their niche. A ship full of knowledge is more powerful than a knowledgeable ship.

No-one likes to hand the reins of their baby over to anyone else. You built the business; you made the early sacrifices; so you should be the one leading from the front, right?

Yes, you should be leading. But do your customers really care who’s leading as long as your business meets their needs?

image: antony chammond

Join over 11,000 smart subscribers

Get my latest updates delivered straight to your Inbox as soon as they're published (I respect your privacy and will never spam you)

0 Shares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Buffer 0 Buffer LinkedIn 0 Email 0 Email to a friend 0 Shares ×
About Danny

Danny Brown is Chief Technologist at ArCompany and an award-winning marketer and blogger. His blog is recognized as the #1 marketing blog in the world by HubSpot. Danny is also co-author of Influence Marketing: How to Create, Manage and Measure Brand Influencers in Social Media Marketing.

41 comments
Leon Noone
Leon Noone

G'Day Danny, Thanks for an interesting and thought provoking post. I'm not certain why there's so much talk on the web about "branding." But it goes on and on. I think that there are three factors for a successful business. The two you mention and marketing. Of these, I think that marketing is the most important. By the way, apart from by own business, I'm not involved in marketing in any way. But experience has taught me that if you don't get your marketing "right," you'll never be as successful as you could be. I'm not quite sure if people mean "marketing" when they say "branding." I suspect that branding is part of marketing. And i sometimes wonder whether it might be more fruitful to concentrate on getting one's marketing right before becoming over concerned with branding. After all, if you get your marketing "right," proper branding will follow: not the other way around. That's enough heresy from an Aussie for one day. Make sure you have fun. Regards Leon

Leon Noone
Leon Noone

G'Day Danny,

Thanks for an interesting and thought provoking post. I'm not certain why there's so much talk on the web about "branding." But it goes on and on.

I think that there are three factors for a successful business. The two you mention and marketing. Of these, I think that marketing is the most important. By the way, apart from by own business, I'm not involved in marketing in any way.

But experience has taught me that if you don't get your marketing "right," you'll never be as successful as you could be.

I'm not quite sure if people mean "marketing" when they say "branding." I suspect that branding is part of marketing. And i sometimes wonder whether it might be more fruitful to concentrate on getting one's marketing right before becoming over concerned with branding.

After all, if you get your marketing "right," proper branding will follow: not the other way around.

That's enough heresy from an Aussie for one day.

Make sure you have fun.

Regards

Leon

Leon Noone
Leon Noone

G'Day Danny,

Thanks for an interesting and thought provoking post. I'm not certain why there's so much talk on the web about "branding." But it goes on and on.

I think that there are three factors for a successful business. The two you mention and marketing. Of these, I think that marketing is the most important. By the way, apart from by own business, I'm not involved in marketing in any way.

But experience has taught me that if you don't get your marketing "right," you'll never be as successful as you could be.

I'm not quite sure if people mean "marketing" when they say "branding." I suspect that branding is part of marketing. And i sometimes wonder whether it might be more fruitful to concentrate on getting one's marketing right before becoming over concerned with branding.

After all, if you get your marketing "right," proper branding will follow: not the other way around.

That's enough heresy from an Aussie for one day.

Make sure you have fun.

Regards

Leon

Jeremie Brecheisen
Jeremie Brecheisen

Hey Danny,

Thanks for this post. I think the most important person in a company is the person who is serving you. Real and lasting leadership relies less on personalities and more on creating a lasting culture that breeds engaged employees proactively trying to make my experience as magical as possible.

Danny
Danny

Perfect, Jeremie, just perfect. Now if only more "leaders" would read your comment. :)

Jeremie Brecheisen
Jeremie Brecheisen

Hey Danny, Thanks for this post. I think the most important person in a company is the person who is serving you. Real and lasting leadership relies less on personalities and more on creating a lasting culture that breeds engaged employees proactively trying to make my experience as magical as possible.

Danny
Danny

Perfect, Jeremie, just perfect. Now if only more "leaders" would read your comment. :)

Davina K. Brewer
Davina K. Brewer

Danny, Good debate on the branding perspective of company vs. person and how for example Scott Monty is the face of Ford, but maybe only in social media. And I've seen the question asked before, what happens when/if he leaves Ford, does he take their social media credibility, community with him or does it stick with the brand?

For Apple, I wonder if Steve Jobs.. if it's personality, persona, charisma that carries over more. The anecdotes and stories all adding to the "Steve IS Apple" mystique? I'm with you on your need for a plan to protect the brand, the company by showing more people. Apple has done that in the last few keynotes, using team leaders to introduce new products, features.

Per Jerry's comment about connecting with a person, not a logo that is a Catch-22 of social media. I want to connect with a human but at the same time I'm less concerned with who is in charge, so long as my computer or car is doing what I need it to. FWIW.

Davina K. Brewer
Davina K. Brewer

Danny, Good debate on the branding perspective of company vs. person and how for example Scott Monty is the face of Ford, but maybe only in social media. And I've seen the question asked before, what happens when/if he leaves Ford, does he take their social media credibility, community with him or does it stick with the brand?

For Apple, I wonder if Steve Jobs.. if it's personality, persona, charisma that carries over more. The anecdotes and stories all adding to the "Steve IS Apple" mystique? I'm with you on your need for a plan to protect the brand, the company by showing more people. Apple has done that in the last few keynotes, using team leaders to introduce new products, features.

Per Jerry's comment about connecting with a person, not a logo that is a Catch-22 of social media. I want to connect with a human but at the same time I'm less concerned with who is in charge, so long as my computer or car is doing what I need it to. FWIW.

Danny
Danny

I guess it depends where Scott goes, and what his "fans" prefer - are they Monty guys, or Ford guys? If it's Ford, then I can't see a great many leaving to follow Scott.

I think Apple probably realized that having Jobs as the main man wasn't too smart. Either from a shareholder concern (when his health was an issue), or from a bombastic view (yes, we love Jobs' passion, but he can also be a dick in public). Like you say, they've begun to mix it up, and I think that's benefiting them more.

Davina K. Brewer
Davina K. Brewer

Good point about Scott, following the person vs. the content. I do think Apple is softening the ground by putting others front and center, yet I'm more interested in the goods than the pitchmen. If they keep making quality products that I enjoy using, I'll probably keep buying.

Davina K. Brewer
Davina K. Brewer

Danny, Good debate on the branding perspective of company vs. person and how for example Scott Monty is the face of Ford, but maybe only in social media. And I've seen the question asked before, what happens when/if he leaves Ford, does he take their social media credibility, community with him or does it stick with the brand? For Apple, I wonder if Steve Jobs.. if it's personality, persona, charisma that carries over more. The anecdotes and stories all adding to the "Steve IS Apple" mystique? I'm with you on your need for a plan to protect the brand, the company by showing more people. Apple has done that in the last few keynotes, using team leaders to introduce new products, features. Per Jerry's comment about connecting with a person, not a logo that is a Catch-22 of social media. I want to connect with a human but at the same time I'm less concerned with who is in charge, so long as my computer or car is doing what I need it to. FWIW.

Danny
Danny

I guess it depends where Scott goes, and what his "fans" prefer - are they Monty guys, or Ford guys? If it's Ford, then I can't see a great many leaving to follow Scott. I think Apple probably realized that having Jobs as the main man wasn't too smart. Either from a shareholder concern (when his health was an issue), or from a bombastic view (yes, we love Jobs' passion, but he can also be a dick in public). Like you say, they've begun to mix it up, and I think that's benefiting them more.

Davina K. Brewer
Davina K. Brewer

Good point about Scott, following the person vs. the content. I do think Apple is softening the ground by putting others front and center, yet I'm more interested in the goods than the pitchmen. If they keep making quality products that I enjoy using, I'll probably keep buying.

Margie Clayman (
Margie Clayman (

I see your point, certainly. However, coming from the family-owned agency side of things, I have to add that I think some people like knowing that a company/brand has been in a family for a long while, which is a bit different than starting your own company from scratch in the here and now. It speaks to core values, long relationships, and good business before an actual word is spoken.

Companies like Johnson & Johnson, Ford, and others use a family name that once belonged to the front dude, but now the names are just family names, and people probably don't even think much about the fact that these famous brands and companies are carrying real peoples' names.

Just thought I'd add in that slightly different family perspective :)

Margie Clayman (@margeclayman)
Margie Clayman (@margeclayman)

I see your point, certainly. However, coming from the family-owned agency side of things, I have to add that I think some people like knowing that a company/brand has been in a family for a long while, which is a bit different than starting your own company from scratch in the here and now. It speaks to core values, long relationships, and good business before an actual word is spoken.

Companies like Johnson & Johnson, Ford, and others use a family name that once belonged to the front dude, but now the names are just family names, and people probably don't even think much about the fact that these famous brands and companies are carrying real peoples' names.

Just thought I'd add in that slightly different family perspective :)

Danny
Danny

That's a good point, Margie, and one that can definitely work. But I think maybe one of the reasons they do work is that Ford, the Johnsons and others like them never felt the need to be at the forefront of their business.

It'd be interesting to see if the same was true for Jobs, Wozniak and Wayne had they not gone for Apple. ;-)

Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman
Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman

Well, you have to admit, calling a computer company "Wozniaks & Jobs, Inc" or something like that wouldn't have exactly rolled off the tongue!

It is interesting that in the marketing world, anyway, most people probably think of Scott Monty as the face of Ford. Do you think it's so?

Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman
Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman

Well, you have to admit, calling a computer company "Wozniaks & Jobs, Inc" or something like that wouldn't have exactly rolled off the tongue!

It is interesting that in the marketing world, anyway, most people probably think of Scott Monty as the face of Ford. Do you think it's so?

Danny
Danny

Maybe in the social media sphere. Not too sure how many folks that don't care about social media would see Scott as the face, over the likes of William C. Ford Jr. or Alan Mulally.

I think we tend to forget we're still a small percentage of the business world, and the faces and names we take for granted mean nothing to little elsewhere.

I ran a poll at an event once, asking people who they'd heard of from Seth Godin, Chris Brogan, Darren Rowse and John Chow.

Almost all had heard of Godin - very few had heard of the others. I think that's telling in how Internet fame and awareness still holds little sway offline.

Margie Clayman (
Margie Clayman (

I see your point, certainly. However, coming from the family-owned agency side of things, I have to add that I think some people like knowing that a company/brand has been in a family for a long while, which is a bit different than starting your own company from scratch in the here and now. It speaks to core values, long relationships, and good business before an actual word is spoken. Companies like Johnson & Johnson, Ford, and others use a family name that once belonged to the front dude, but now the names are just family names, and people probably don't even think much about the fact that these famous brands and companies are carrying real peoples' names. Just thought I'd add in that slightly different family perspective :)

Danny
Danny

That's a good point, Margie, and one that can definitely work. But I think maybe one of the reasons they do work is that Ford, the Johnsons and others like them never felt the need to be at the forefront of their business. It'd be interesting to see if the same was true for Jobs, Wozniak and Wayne had they not gone for Apple. ;-)

Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman
Marjorie Clayman @margieclayman

Well, you have to admit, calling a computer company "Wozniaks & Jobs, Inc" or something like that wouldn't have exactly rolled off the tongue! It is interesting that in the marketing world, anyway, most people probably think of Scott Monty as the face of Ford. Do you think it's so?

Danny
Danny

Maybe in the social media sphere. Not too sure how many folks that don't care about social media would see Scott as the face, over the likes of William C. Ford Jr. or Alan Mulally. I think we tend to forget we're still a small percentage of the business world, and the faces and names we take for granted mean nothing to little elsewhere. I ran a poll at an event once, asking people who they'd heard of from Seth Godin, Chris Brogan, Darren Rowse and John Chow. Almost all had heard of Godin - very few had heard of the others. I think that's telling in how Internet fame and awareness still holds little sway offline.

TrafficColeman
TrafficColeman

It comes down to productivity..its about who you are and what your trying to accomplish in your company. Sometime an company can have too many chiefs and not enough Indianans. "Black Seo Guy "Signing Off"

Danny
Danny

There's always that danger for sure, Coleman - then you need really good management and business sense to make sure you don't fall into that trap.

TrafficColeman
TrafficColeman

It comes down to productivity..its about who you are and what your trying to accomplish in your company. Sometime an company can have too many chiefs and not enough Indianans.

"Black Seo Guy "Signing Off"

Danny
Danny

There's always that danger for sure, Coleman - then you need really good management and business sense to make sure you don't fall into that trap.

Rahul
Rahul

Hi Dan, i always dropped by here to make some reading about your post and i admire it because it is based on on reality. Here i can say is that people working in a business need to be loved and treated very well because they are also important in making business success. Every good achievement need a little appreciation for them to know that they are in the right path..

Danny
Danny

Hi Rahul, agree completely sir - look after your people, your people will look after you. :)

Rahul
Rahul

Hi Dan, i always dropped by here to make some reading about your post and i admire it because it is based on on reality. Here i can say is that people working in a business need to be loved and treated very well because they are also important in making business success. Every good achievement need a little appreciation for them to know that they are in the right path..

Danny
Danny

Hi Rahul, agree completely sir - look after your people, your people will look after you. :)

Geoff Livingston
Geoff Livingston

"Make your business the brand:" My first company was called Livingston Communications, huge issue for me in scaling and something I regret to this day. We are smarter the second time around, though personal marketing issues continue to be a consistent matter to resolve. Good post, Danny.

Geoff Livingston
Geoff Livingston

"Make your business the brand:" My first company was called Livingston Communications, huge issue for me in scaling and something I regret to this day. We are smarter the second time around, though personal marketing issues continue to be a consistent matter to resolve. Good post, Danny.

Danny
Danny

There definitely seems to be a bigger focus by many on building their own brand as opposed to that of their company. I wonder how some of the Internet-famous would fare if it came to trying to sell their business, when all they're known for is their own blog, or book, etc?

Geoff Livingston
Geoff Livingston

"Make your business the brand:" My first company was called Livingston Communications, huge issue for me in scaling and something I regret to this day. We are smarter the second time around, though personal marketing issues continue to be a consistent matter to resolve. Good post, Danny.

Danny
Danny

There definitely seems to be a bigger focus by many on building their own brand as opposed to that of their company. I wonder how some of the Internet-famous would fare if it came to trying to sell their business, when all they're known for is their own blog, or book, etc?

Jerry Nihen
Jerry Nihen

Another fantastic article. I think that it's easier to associate with a person, rather than a brand though. That being said, your points are very valid that the business can go on and on, however the head person may not. I think the "spread the love" is the most important bullet about increasing the brand of your business.

Danny
Danny

Hi there Jerry,

Agreed - no-one likes talking to a logo! ;-)

That's why the build-from-within approach is such an important one. You get people that know the culture of the company and can continue moving it forward long after the founders may have moved on.

Cheers, sir, appreciate you dropping by.

Jerry Nihen
Jerry Nihen

Another fantastic article. I think that it's easier to associate with a person, rather than a brand though. That being said, your points are very valid that the business can go on and on, however the head person may not. I think the "spread the love" is the most important bullet about increasing the brand of your business.

Danny
Danny

Hi there Jerry, Agreed - no-one likes talking to a logo! ;-) That's why the build-from-within approach is such an important one. You get people that know the culture of the company and can continue moving it forward long after the founders may have moved on. Cheers, sir, appreciate you dropping by.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kristi Hines, JobShoots, Peter @ Romow, Karen Pore, Vinoth Chandar and others. Vinoth Chandar said: #SocialMedia Protecting Your Assets http://bit.ly/fkdZKR #Marketing #SM [...]

  2. [...] Protecting Your Assets or Knowing Your Company’s Identity | Danny Brown [...]


0 Shares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Buffer 0 Buffer LinkedIn 0 Email 0 Email to a friend 0 Shares ×