Social media is many things to many people. For some, it’s a core part of their overall business and marketing strategy. For others, it’s a key player in driving traffic to their blog. For others, it’s a new toy they’re just beginning to play with. And for some, it’s about as interesting as pond moss.

So, lots of uses and definitions, depending on who you speak to.

Yet there is one area where all the definitions can come together and agree on, and that’s the area of social media myths. The claims from people that should know better, either for a hidden agenda or a lack of foresight.

So, here are a few social media myths that we can probably all agree are out-of-date thinking at best, and dangerous advice at worst.

Social Media is Free

Bzzzzt (insert noisy buzzer sound here). This one’s been doing the rounds for a while now, and still seems to pop up, even though everything points to the complete opposite. So let’s make it simple – social media is not free.

Yes, the tools are free (unless you have the premium version of these platforms). And, no, not everyone will be looking at the cost investment from the example linked to above.

But even if you’re a small business user or solo entrepreneur using social media to help raise awareness of your brand through interaction, you have to invest a serious amount of time for any traction to begin. So take whatever salary you give yourself, deduct the man hours you put in by the financial cost of this, and that’s the bare minimum of how much social media is going to cost you.

Add to that any advertising on the likes of Facebook Ads and LinkedIn Advertising, and then how you’re going to integrate all your online stuff into your everyday marketing and promotion, and the costs start to add up.

Sure, you can bootstrap your way around social media – but free it ain’t.

Social Media Levels the Playing Field

One of the pros of social media, according to many of its most vocal proponents, is that it levels the playing field. This comes from the viewpoint that it allows the consumer – who never had much of a voice before – to air their grievances in a far more public forum, as well as have access to leading players at these brands.

The belief is that this now means the brand is no longer in control, and the little guy is now the giant. And it’s true – social media does allow the consumer to be a bigger part of the business decisions being made.

Yet there’s also the flip side for businesses. A lot of social media purists will say that small businesses and solo practitioners can compete with the huge corporations and the big agencies, because the tools are the same for everyone.

Except they’re not. A corporation with a $10 million budget for research, strategy, implementation and measuring is going to have a heck of a lot more at their disposal than a small business with $10,000 to play with. And then the scale factor comes into play – can a one-man band (or even a two or three-man band) monitor and respond to social interaction the same way a dedicated team of fifty can for the bigger guys?

The simple answer is no. So, yes, social media can level the field somewhat – but then it also means you have to get new machinery to keep it level, and that’s still beyond the capabilities of many businesses.

You Need the Voice of the Influencers

Like any eco-system, social media has many layers, and at the forefront of these layers are the Influencers. Usually these will be early adopters in the space, and they’ve become influential for identifying trends and looking at how these tools can be used for business.

The problem is, influence is based on relevance, yet many businesses still try and get the Influencers to talk about their products, regardless of whether they’re experienced in that brand’s niche or not. The mindset is that the Influencer has over 100,000 Twitter followers, or tens of thousands of blog subscribers, so it’s an easy “in” to that audience.

Except it’s not.

Because nine times out of ten (not a scientific figure), the Influencer will only share your brand or product for reward. Hard cash, or a large amount of swag. They’ll write about you once, and then move on to the next brand. Because they’re (usually) not invested in you.

But your brand advocates are.

The ones that write and talk about you every day, both online and offline. The ones that truly have your best interests at heart, so they’ll offer you honest feedback on how you can improve. Compare that to the Influencer who thinks your product is great, now just pony up the greenback.

The Influencer may get you a quick buzz, but longevity and success very rarely come from a fire sale. It does come from having an army of advocates and loyal customers, though – look after your advocates and they’ll look after you better than any Influencer can.

Conclusion

There’s no doubt that social media has changed much of the business landscape, and continues to do so. And with potentially game-changing products like Google+ entering the fray, the real fun could just be beginning.

We just need to make sure we’re keeping a level head at what social media can, and doesn’t, offer. If history has taught us anything, it’s that hyperbole is very often the precursor to, “Remember so-and-so?”…

image: Luminis Kanto

Get my latest posts as soon as they're published

Join over 12,000 smart subscribers and receive my latest posts as soon as they're published - simply enter your email below (I respect your privacy and will never spam you).

Alternatively, click here to subscribe to the RSS feed instead.

121 comments
deleted_2164790_donnaM13
deleted_2164790_donnaM13

my biggest pet peeve has always been 'the influencers'. Years ago, it was thought that if a certain group of people followed you on twitter, you were blessed... sorry to say I ended up blocking most of them (and then unblocking) - which drops them off your 'followers list'. I didnt need them following me, esp as (as you say) they arent particularly relevant to what everyone (me ) is doing. ..and they're plain boring ;) I"m a big fan of keeping it real, no bullshit, which is why i follow you on twitter and find your blogs a breath of fresh air.   However.. i am gonna quibble about one point :) - i think it is completely possible (and far more likely actually) for a smaller company to keep up with their social sites and interact with their brand fans on a real tangible basis, than the larger companies. If you dedicate one person to doing just that, its not that difficult to keep on top of things - your customer base is smaller for one, if you're a local business, you have the advantage of having met many of your fans/advocates in real life, and probably know some by name.. all bonus points compared with a larger faceless corporation that only sees the bottom dollar.

SarahEdwardsCUP
SarahEdwardsCUP

"social media is not free."

I completely agree with this, not only from a business perspective but also from a personal one. I know people who are active members of at least five different social networks for various topics and interests. I look at their @sociallyat pages (which show all of the social networks you are a part of) and I'm amazed at how many things they are a part of . They spend HOURS every day updating, keeping in touch with their friends, etc. This is great for fulfilling their interests and I know they enjoy it, but when you are out having coffee and they are glued to their iPhone and ignoring the "reality" going on around them, it is very frustrating. I swear some of them spend longer on the internet than they do sleeping!!!

SarahEdwardsCUP
SarahEdwardsCUP

"social media is not free." I completely agree with this, not only from a business perspective but also from a personal one. I know people who are active members of at least five different social networks for various topics and interests. I look at their sociallyat pages (which show all of the social networks you are a part of) and I'm amazed at how many things they are a part of . They spend HOURS every day updating, keeping in touch with their friends, etc. This is great for fulfilling their interests and I know they enjoy it, but when you are out having coffee and they are glued to their iPhone and ignoring the "reality" going on around them, it is very frustrating. I swear some of them spend longer on the internet than they do sleeping!!!

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@AliceDunn I'm a big believer in being where you need to be, Alice. If that.s Facebook, be there. If it's LinkedIn, be there. If you'd rather "control" from your own plot of land - your blog, for example - be there. I'd rather be strong in limited places than stretched in multiple ones.

AliceDunn
AliceDunn

Guess I will hold off on social media for a while. It always seems to be too time intensif, but a lot of friends encourage me to get into social media. How about starting with just one social media website?

Latest blog post: About Me

AliceDunn
AliceDunn

Guess I will hold off on social media for a while. It always seems to be too time intensif, but a lot of friends encourage me to get into social media. How about starting with just one social media website?

ginidietrich
ginidietrich

@DannyBrown Sure, that makes sense. Though, we have a client who is a print distributor and was not know, at all, in the industry two years ago. When he started blogging, his #1 goal was to be nominated as the industry's president. Guess who the incoming president is for 2012?

ginidietrich
ginidietrich

I actually don't agree that you think it doesn't level the playing field. Well, I agree with the reasons you list. But Arment Dietrich has been able to compete with the large, global firms in our backyard because of social. Before all of this, we weren't even a speck on a fly's butt. Now we go up against them in new business pitches about eight times out of 10. Do we win every one? No. But we at least get the opportunity. Because of social and the efforts we've done in the past four years, people think we're bigger than we are.

But the whole "it's free" baloney is right on. It's more time intense than anything in our field...except maybe media relations.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich

I actually don't agree that you think it doesn't level the playing field. Well, I agree with the reasons you list. But Arment Dietrich has been able to compete with the large, global firms in our backyard because of social. Before all of this, we weren't even a speck on a fly's butt. Now we go up against them in new business pitches about eight times out of 10. Do we win every one? No. But we at least get the opportunity. Because of social and the efforts we've done in the past four years, people think we're bigger than we are. But the whole "it's free" baloney is right on. It's more time intense than anything in our field...except maybe media relations. My latest conversation: http://www.spinsucks.com/social-media/gin-and-topics-creepy-old-guys-and-memories/

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@bdorman264 Hi there mate, Love this quote from you: "The flip side is, if you were involved in non-revenue generating activities w/in that time frame anyway, you might as well try this out and see if there is a spot in here for you." If it's not costing you any more than something you're already doing - or not doing, as you mention - is it really worth missing the potential return you could get? Cheers, sir, have a great one yourself. My latest conversation: http://bestbloggingtipsonline.com/the-series/

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@PeterMasters Was it Safeway? I used to work with their media team a few years back and they were cautious about that. :) It is surprising how many businesses still fear social media. I think one of the key factors is that many businesses are under the impression it needs to be a standalone offering, as opposed to an integrated one, and if they can just get over that roadblock... Here's to more education, Peter - cheers! My latest conversation: http://bestbloggingtipsonline.com/the-series/

bdorman264
bdorman264

The good news is, pretty much everybody is 'aware' of social media. And it's true, some are 'all in' while some could really care less. What that wide range of strata tells me is, there is a huge amount of opportunity and you don't need global domination to tap into it.

The bad news is, not only does it take time but lots of it. If your time is worth $100 an hour and you are spending 3-4 hours a day 'in it'; how quickly will you have to gain quantifiable traction to even think about seeing a return on investment? The flip side is, if you were involved in non-revenue generating activities w/in that time frame anyway, you might as well try this out and see if there is a spot in here for you.

Influencers, we can see who really has influence and to what degree. But what if you only influence one person and that person is a true influencer? This is where I see the power of networking because you might not be the guy, but you might have access to him.

Good post and that's probably all I will say about that. Hope you have a great weekend.

bdorman264
bdorman264

The good news is, pretty much everybody is 'aware' of social media. And it's true, some are 'all in' while some could really care less. What that wide range of strata tells me is, there is a huge amount of opportunity and you don't need global domination to tap into it. The bad news is, not only does it take time but lots of it. If your time is worth $100 an hour and you are spending 3-4 hours a day 'in it'; how quickly will you have to gain quantifiable traction to even think about seeing a return on investment? The flip side is, if you were involved in non-revenue generating activities w/in that time frame anyway, you might as well try this out and see if there is a spot in here for you. Influencers, we can see who really has influence and to what degree. But what if you only influence one person and that person is a true influencer? This is where I see the power of networking because you might not be the guy, but you might have access to him. Good post and that's probably all I will say about that. Hope you have a great weekend.

PeterMasters
PeterMasters

Great post, thanks Danny!

I sat with the directors of one of the UK's largest supermarkets for over an hour yesterday and I was amazed at how little they knew about social media.

I think they were surprised at how little they knew!

Would you believe that a company with a turn over of nearly £400,000,000 thinks that 1 guy should be able to create and maintain a successful social media campaign.

They were amazed at what I had to say and at what they could achieve with a little imagination and a fairly modest budget (compared to TV & print etc).

Their decision is to take it slowly. They've got a new static website being built.

I explained to them concepts like inbound and permission marketing but I'm not sure they realized that 'the customer is king' now!

I wish them well.

I should send them this post, I'm sure it would help.

Thanks Danny, all the best, Peter

PeterMasters
PeterMasters

Great post, thanks Danny! I sat with the directors of one of the UK's largest supermarkets for over an hour yesterday and I was amazed at how little they knew about social media. I think they were surprised at how little they knew! Would you believe that a company with a turn over of nearly £400,000,000 thinks that 1 guy should be able to create and maintain a successful social media campaign. They were amazed at what I had to say and at what they could achieve with a little imagination and a fairly modest budget (compared to TV & print etc). Their decision is to take it slowly. They've got a new static website being built. I explained to them concepts like inbound and permission marketing but I'm not sure they realized that 'the customer is king' now! I wish them well. I should send them this post, I'm sure it would help. Thanks Danny, all the best, Peter

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@Maranda Hey there miss, Great to see you over here, hope you're keeping well! :) So true - at the end of the day, your customers are the ones that will see your bills paid or your checks bounced. So better get talking with them. ;-) My latest conversation: http://bestbloggingtipsonline.com/the-series/

Maranda
Maranda

Thanks Danny! This is a great commentary on the things we seem to think when we start a social media strategy. I don't think people realize that it's a "full time job." As far as influencers go... well, it's great, but you're right, making a connection with your customers is a much better use of your time. And if you want to reach out to an influencer, that's all right too, or even try finding common ground with them -- Like a mutual understanding of the awesome that is Gordon Ramsey :)

Maranda
Maranda

Thanks Danny! This is a great commentary on the things we seem to think when we start a social media strategy. I don't think people realize that it's a "full time job." As far as influencers go... well, it's great, but you're right, making a connection with your customers is a much better use of your time. And if you want to reach out to an influencer, that's all right too, or even try finding common ground with them -- Like a mutual understanding of the awesome that is Gordon Ramsey :)

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@victoria buckley Hi Victoria, That's a fair point, though I think it comes down to the person as opposed to the size of the company. If you look at the blog of the guy that owns the Marriott hotel chains, that's as personal and as connecting as it comes. Then I've seen owners of SMB's that are just the worst online, since they have a very tunnel vision-minded approach that they know best and that's that. So, completely agree that more often than not, the smaller guys are more personal - but I'm also seeing more larger companies allow their employees and core personnel be more personal too. Here's to a happy mix somewhere in-between. :) My latest conversation: http://dannybrown.me/2010/12/24/social-media-christmas/

DannyBrown
DannyBrown

@JanetAronica It's so true - I can't think of anyone that works for free. True, there are volunteers at things, but you still need to work to be able to eat. So time is definitely money. And expect an overview of SocialBase, and some potential solutions/offerings in the next week. :) My latest conversation: http://dannybrown.me/2010/12/24/social-media-christmas/

JanetAronica
JanetAronica

LOVE the "social media isn't free" one! Not just for the SocialBase love... but it's so true. People say the best thing about social media marketing is that "Twitter is free"... but I disagree and am definitely one of those to say that "time is money." Same thing goes for tools. People come to oneforty all the time and ask us about free tools for kinda tricky problems... and these things could be resolved by paying $100/month or so for a monitoring tool (there ARE tools in that price range) but instead they hack it with RSS feeds and alerts from free tools... and that all takes a lot of time. This post explains that a little more: http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com/2010/09/07/social-media-dashboards-what-makes-us-pay-for-them/

Great post!

JanetAronica
JanetAronica

LOVE the "social media isn't free" one! Not just for the SocialBase love... but it's so true. People say the best thing about social media marketing is that "Twitter is free"... but I disagree and am definitely one of those to say that "time is money." Same thing goes for tools. People come to oneforty all the time and ask us about free tools for kinda tricky problems... and these things could be resolved by paying $100/month or so for a monitoring tool (there ARE tools in that price range) but instead they hack it with RSS feeds and alerts from free tools... and that all takes a lot of time. This post explains that a little more: http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com/2010/09/07/social-media-dashboards-what-makes-us-pay-for-them/ Great post! My latest conversation: http://www.yesware.com/blog/2011/07/19/selling-and-customer-development/

victoria buckley
victoria buckley

Good post! I do kind of disagree with the unlevel playing field. everything you say is right, big business do have more resources to tackle social media,but I think small business's have one great advantage over big corps- a personal voice. I see so many big companies who still don't know how to take on twitter and the like. It's a clearer decision for smart smaller entities who are nimble,genuine and able to experiment more.

victoria buckley
victoria buckley

Good post! I do kind of disagree with the unlevel playing field. everything you say is right, big business do have more resources to tackle social media,but I think small business's have one great advantage over big corps- a personal voice. I see so many big companies who still don't know how to take on twitter and the like. It's a clearer decision for smart smaller entities who are nimble,genuine and able to experiment more.

Pixels and Clicks
Pixels and Clicks

Another myth that needs debunking among business owners is that you don't need strategies, you don't need to understand your market and the only thing standing between you and success are tools.

To many folks, social media means simply updating your FB page or blasting tweets (I haven't seen a lot of "advice" regarding Google+ yet but I guess the snake oil is soon going to flow)

Pixels and Clicks
Pixels and Clicks

Another myth that needs debunking among business owners is that you don't need strategies, you don't need to understand your market and the only thing standing between you and success are tools.To many folks, social media means simply updating your FB page or blasting tweets (I haven't seen a lot of "advice" regarding Google+ yet but I guess the snake oil is soon going to flow)

Clay Morgan
Clay Morgan

Danny, great post. I read it and wondered when you and I are going to stop thinking alike. Social media is so powerful, so useful - it can be a real game changer (heck, it has for many people). Yet, many misconceptions and misunderstandings about what it can and can't do, as well as what it is and is not, remain. These misconceptions are hurting the "social media industry" as a whole, and will continue to do so until they are cleared up.

Clay Morgan
Clay Morgan

Danny, great post. I read it and wondered when you and I are going to stop thinking alike. Social media is so powerful, so useful - it can be a real game changer (heck, it has for many people). Yet, many misconceptions and misunderstandings about what it can and can't do, as well as what it is and is not, remain. These misconceptions are hurting the "social media industry" as a whole, and will continue to do so until they are cleared up.

Jane | Find All Answers
Jane | Find All Answers

Social media consumes time, lot of our energy, it is addictive and is quite a distraction. It is so addictive that we create myths ourselves! Thanks for this wonderful reminder to clear up the social media hangover.

Jane | Find All Answers
Jane | Find All Answers

Social media consumes time, lot of our energy, it is addictive and is quite a distraction. It is so addictive that we create myths ourselves! Thanks for this wonderful reminder to clear up the social media hangover.

Brandon
Brandon

You've made an artform out of 'real-speak' Danny.

Great insight as usual. Some of us, me included, do not have a physical, tangible product at this point to sell. I am doing what I do to build a platform that I will be able to spring from later. I use several of the big SOME sites to do this and I have a *gasp* 'plan'!

I have no dilusions of granduere that I will ever be on the same level as others, and I learned very quickly that none of this is 'free.' The good thing is that after I do this for another 10 years (whoa, right? I'm not kidding) the payoff will be spectacular.

Glad to have such smart people to learn from and the patience to set myself up for success! Have you seen this approach?

Brandon
Brandon

You've made an artform out of 'real-speak' Danny.

Great insight as usual. Some of us, me included, do not have a physical, tangible product at this point to sell. I am doing what I do to build a platform that I will be able to spring from later. I use several of the big SOME sites to do this and I have a *gasp* 'plan'!

I have no dilusions of granduere that I will ever be on the same level as others, and I learned very quickly that none of this is 'free.' The good thing is that after I do this for another 10 years (whoa, right? I'm not kidding) the payoff will be spectacular.

Glad to have such smart people to learn from and the patience to set myself up for success! Have you seen this approach?

Brandon
Brandon

You've made an artform out of 'real-speak' Danny. Great insight as usual. Some of us, me included, do not have a physical, tangible product at this point to sell. I am doing what I do to build a platform that I will be able to spring from later. I use several of the big SOME sites to do this and I have a *gasp* 'plan'! I have no dilusions of granduere that I will ever be on the same level as others, and I learned very quickly that none of this is 'free.' The good thing is that after I do this for another 10 years (whoa, right? I'm not kidding) the payoff will be spectacular. Glad to have such smart people to learn from and the patience to set myself up for success! Have you seen this approach?

Eugene
Eugene

To your first point...I couldn't agree any more. I just wrote a post about the ROI of Social Media and it seems that every post I come across doesn't really do a good job of explaining it.

All of the "how to measure the ROI posts" leave out the actual "how" and focus on the "why". The few I ran across that actually show numbers focus on the "return" and not really the full "investment."

Getting a $1,000 on $240 of Facebook ads doesn't give you a true return because you put in a lot more resources into creating those ads than just the $240.

I haven't published the post yet though. Not sure whether I should do it on my own blog or submit it as a guest post.

Eugene
Eugene

To your first point...I couldn't agree any more. I just wrote a post about the ROI of Social Media and it seems that every post I come across doesn't really do a good job of explaining it.

All of the "how to measure the ROI posts" leave out the actual "how" and focus on the "why". The few I ran across that actually show numbers focus on the "return" and not really the full "investment."

Getting a $1,000 on $240 of Facebook ads doesn't give you a true return because you put in a lot more resources into creating those ads than just the $240.

I haven't published the post yet though. Not sure whether I should do it on my own blog or submit it as a guest post.

Eugene
Eugene

To your first point...I couldn't agree any more. I just wrote a post about the ROI of Social Media and it seems that every post I come across doesn't really do a good job of explaining it. All of the "how to measure the ROI posts" leave out the actual "how" and focus on the "why". The few I ran across that actually show numbers focus on the "return" and not really the full "investment." Getting a $1,000 on $240 of Facebook ads doesn't give you a true return because you put in a lot more resources into creating those ads than just the $240. I haven't published the post yet though. Not sure whether I should do it on my own blog or submit it as a guest post.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@AliceDunn I'm a big believer in being where you need to be, Alice. If that.s Facebook, be there. If it's LinkedIn, be there. If you'd rather "control" from your own plot of land - your blog, for example - be there.

I'd rather be strong in limited places than stretched in multiple ones.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@bdorman264 Hi there mate,

Love this quote from you:

"The flip side is, if you were involved in non-revenue generating activities w/in that time frame anyway, you might as well try this out and see if there is a spot in here for you."

If it's not costing you any more than something you're already doing - or not doing, as you mention - is it really worth missing the potential return you could get?

Cheers, sir, have a great one yourself.

Latest blog post: The Series

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@PeterMasters Was it Safeway? I used to work with their media team a few years back and they were cautious about that. :)

It is surprising how many businesses still fear social media. I think one of the key factors is that many businesses are under the impression it needs to be a standalone offering, as opposed to an integrated one, and if they can just get over that roadblock...

Here's to more education, Peter - cheers!

Latest blog post: The Series

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@Maranda Hey there miss,

Great to see you over here, hope you're keeping well! :)

So true - at the end of the day, your customers are the ones that will see your bills paid or your checks bounced. So better get talking with them. ;-)

Latest blog post: The Series

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@JanetAronica

It's so true - I can't think of anyone that works for free. True, there are volunteers at things, but you still need to work to be able to eat. So time is definitely money.

And expect an overview of SocialBase, and some potential solutions/offerings in the next week. :)

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@victoria buckley

Hi Victoria,

That's a fair point, though I think it comes down to the person as opposed to the size of the company.

If you look at the blog of the guy that owns the Marriott hotel chains, that's as personal and as connecting as it comes. Then I've seen owners of SMB's that are just the worst online, since they have a very tunnel vision-minded approach that they know best and that's that.

So, completely agree that more often than not, the smaller guys are more personal - but I'm also seeing more larger companies allow their employees and core personnel be more personal too.

Here's to a happy mix somewhere in-between. :)

Danny
Danny

Hey there mate,

Can't argue with that approach at all. So many - people or businesses - forget that putting the right legwork in to start with plays a huge part in subsequent success.

Sounds to me you're doing it right. :)

Danny
Danny

Hey there mate, Can't argue with that approach at all. So many - people or businesses - forget that putting the right legwork in to start with plays a huge part in subsequent success. Sounds to me you're doing it right. :)

Danny
Danny

Hi there Eugene,

Completely agree, mate - I wrote about some of the questions you need to ask to prep the How earlier this year:

http://dannybrown.me/2011/02/22/why-social-media/

Like you say, there's a lot of Why's, and some How's, but there can often be a big gap in the real getting-hands-dirty How.

Look forward to reading your post, mate, and happy to host here if you prefer.

Danny
Danny

Hi there Eugene, Completely agree, mate - I wrote about some of the questions you need to ask to prep the How earlier this year: http://dannybrown.me/2011/02/22/why-social-media/ Like you say, there's a lot of Why's, and some How's, but there can often be a big gap in the real getting-hands-dirty How. Look forward to reading your post, mate, and happy to host here if you prefer.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich

@Danny Brown Sure, that makes sense. Though, we have a client who is a print distributor and was not know, at all, in the industry two years ago. When he started blogging, his #1 goal was to be nominated as the industry's president. Guess who the incoming president is for 2012?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Debunking Popular Myths of Social Media – it is that time of year again, the time where social media mythbusting takes center stage. This year the man from the frigid North, Danny Brown, takes on some of the more popular myths of social media. [...]

  2. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  3. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  4. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  5. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  6. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  7. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  8. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  9. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  10. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  11. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  12. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  13. [...] 21. You don’t need the voice of influencers – you need your brand advocates. Engaging with influencers just for the sake of having someone with 100,000 Twitter followers talk or blog about your product isn’t useful because they aren’t invested in your product. Your brand’s existing advocates are. An influencer might get you quick buzz, but your brand advocates offer longevity. (Source: Danny Brown) [...]

  14. [...] Sie sollten sich nicht zu sehr um sogenannte “Influencer” kümmern, sondern um Befürworter Ihrer Marker. Influencer mögen vielleicht 100.000 Twitter-Follower besitzen, aber Ihre Nachrichten über Ihr Unternehmen werden von ihnen kaum wahrgenommen, da sie sich nicht damit verbunden fühlen. Ein Influencer kann Ihnen einen kurzzeitigen Aufschwung ermöglichen, Markenbefürworter stehen für Langlebigkeit. (Quelle: Danny Brown) [...]