Klout sucks. Not because of what they’re trying to do, in measuring your online influence (although I’ll be the first to admit I’m not a fan of that approach for a number of reasons).
Nor do they suck because they’ve engendered a mindset among people to try and grab Klout Perks, based on that perception of influence. Heck, you’ll always have folks that do nothing but want everything for free, so may as well have somewhere for them to spend their time and energy.
No, they suck because they’re stuck in the mindset that opt-out is better than opt-in.
Meaning, they don’t give you a choice when it comes to having a “profile” of you. It doesn’t matter if you sign up to the service or not, or whether you connect your accounts to grow your Klout score.
Because Klout automatically gives you a basic profile anyway.
No permission – there you are, as bright as day online, with whatever score they deem you fit to have based on their perception of you.
Note: I understand that by accepting the Terms of Service on the likes of Twitter, etc, your information can be shared. I’m not sold on that being turned into a full-on profile on another site, though.
I’ll admit, when Klout first came out, I was curious as to how it worked. As someone who needs to connect clients with perceived influencers for outreach and promotional programs, it seemed an interesting way to find those that could help.
Then the flaws appeared.
Just using my account as an example, I recently disconnected all my accounts from Klout, with the exception of Twitter as it wouldn’t let me disconnect that. As a result, my Klout “score” (or influence) dropped from 75 to 63.
So, even though I was still active on the networks I’d disconnected; even though I was sharing the same amount of information, and interacting just as much – if not more – on blogs, Klout felt I was less “influential”.
What they were really saying, though, is that because I wasn’t participating by their rules, I was less influential. Never mind the fact I was still getting “reactions”, if you like, for my interactions online – if Klout didn’t see them, they never happened.
Because I’ve written a fair few times about my lack of “trust” in how Klout perceives influence online, I thought it’d be hypocritical to keep an account there. So I went to delete, which is where the fun began.
I followed the instructions on their site to delete my account, and received an email from Lan at their contact centre advising my account had been removed. This was almost a week ago, and I was advised it could take a day to clear their system.
A week later, and I’m still there, even though I have no desire to be part of the Klout game anymore, nor do I wish to be “on display” on their site, since I (initially) never gave permission.
This is where the opt-out bullshit needs to stop.
It’s more than 10 years since Seth Godin wrote about Permission Marketing, and yet here we are, still being added to things we didn’t have a say in. Fair enough, I added details to Klout, but the initial permission wasn’t there. As it isn’t for anyone.
And to remove yourself, you have to go through hoops to get it done? That’s crap.
It’s not just Klout. Facebook is as bad, as are many other social networks. I had the same issue with Hashable, and got into a debate on Twitter with that service’s founder, who decreed, “Hashable’s not the kind of service people leave, hence there’s no need for an option to delete your account.” (This option was later added.)
Yes. There. Is.
You don’t add people to something and not ask them their permission (unless there’s some legal reason to do so). Especially when that information is there for anyone to see, and make a snap judgement on.
For example, some companies are using Klout scores in the hiring process. If someone has a low score because they don’t know they’re on Klout, and get passed by for a job even though they’re the best qualified, that makes your system screwy (it also doesn’t say much for the research angle of the company in question).
So, please, Klout, and anyone else that puts people onto their platform then makes it almost impossible to get off – be smart. Make it easy to leave. I was able to delete my Empire Avenue account with a single mouse click – why should it be any more difficult than that?
After all, it’s not like you’re just looking to have numbers to show off about your platform to possible investors. That wouldn’t be a reason to keep people on there that want to leave.
Right?
Update 26.10.2011: Seems the link to remove yourself from Klout is now showing an “invalid request”. You can try this one instead.
Note: This post is about Klout and its practices. I have nothing but good words for its CEO Joe Fernandez, who’s always responded to criticism about the service and looked at ways to improve.
~ Update: As of November 1st 2011, you can now delete your Klout account.
image: remuz
In his book 
About Danny
[...] Enough With The Opt-Out Bullshit, Klout originally appeared on Danny Brown | Social Media Marketing Blog – The Human Side of Media and the Social Side of Marketing under a Creative Commons license. [...]
[...] day online, with whatever score they deem you fit to have based on their perception of you,” writes Danny. “You don’t add people to something and not ask them their permission (unless there’s [...]
[...] believe in what they’re doing, and I can’t begrudge them for that. The problem comes in our inability to opt-out of having our names, likenesses, and information being displayed against our [...]
[...] Enough With The Opt-Out Bullshit, Klout [...]
[...] this case (see below), they’re featuring Danny Brown’s rant against Klout on the Klout topic page. Nice to see they aren’t censoring [...]
[...] Enough With the Opt-Out Bullsh*t, Klout (via Danny [...]
[...] [...]
[...] of Influence” is around the more and more people are questioning it. Even some like Danny Brown are trying to remove themselves (unsuccessfully) from their system. In a Klout chat (#kloutchat) on [...]
[...] with the opt-out BS Klout – a post about Klout that will get you thinking about how other sites are creating profiles [...]
[...] If I’d clicked a link to remove my profile and was met with a simple explanation of why Klout thinks their measurement, in time, would prove beneficial to me as one who views the internet as a digital dimension of reputation, and asked if I would allow them to track my online activities *privately* in an effort to advance their research, I would probably connect all kinds of accounts, even going so far as to offer feedback on venues they might be missing (ie; discussion forums, where I have a reach approaching 1.5MM people worldwide based on over a decade participating in them). As it were, having my name and picture up there suggesting I use or endorse their service without my consent wasn’t nearly as infuriating as being all but blown off when I asked nicely to be treated with the most basic of common courtesies. Opt-out should be a definite no-no for any respectable organization. As for Klout itself, more education is needed about online influence. When I first began engaging with social media, I had never heard of Klout. As time went on, I became familiar with the ‘service’ and started checking my own Klout score to see how I (and I confess, others) were doing. After a few months of tweeting more regularly and reading more bloggers, I’m looking at other indicators of someone’s influence. For example, I just read a great post by @bdorman264 about one of his key analytics–he gets an average of over 63 responses to his posts. Now that’s influence. Read more on Opt Out Email Marketing [...]
[...] couple of months back, I wrote about online influence tool Klout, and their approach to how they build their membership (they use opt-out profiling, versus the more [...]
[...] couple of months back, I wrote about online influence tool Klout, and their approach to how they build their membership (they use opt-out profiling, versus the more [...]
[...] make profiles, when users haven’t connected their details with the service. I pointed her to the response from Megan Berry, Klout’s marketing manager, where she says if we don’t want to be tracked, then to make [...]
[...] There’s another way in which Klout, specifically has been controversial. ”Everyone has Klout” says the Klout home page. What that means is that Klout will create a profile for you, whether you’ve opted in to be measured or not. Once they’ve created a profile for you, there is no way to opt out or deactivate your profile. Even if you don’t want to be measured, profiled, tracked or seen as endorsing their product. [...]
[...] ability to delete our Klout accounts. We have Danny Brown to thank for the knowledge of how futile it is to trust that Klout will follow through, [...]
[...] Danny Brown has pointed out many times how awful Klout’s opt-out and account deletion service is. [...]
[...] of people without their permission (based on data from their friends who ARE on Klout).” See this great Danny Brown post on Klout; Danny says that most of the profiles on Klout didn’t opt in, and worse, it appears they can’t [...]
[...] It's awesome that there's a real backlash going on against them right now. Salon has their "Klout's Bad for Your Soul" piece and several bloggers have shit-kicked them as well. Here's Scalzi's piece. Or this. [...]
[...] In her article, Ries also cited that this Klout privacy invasion wasn’t a new issue; in fact Danny Brown reported on Klout’s lack of an opt-out option in [...]
[...] including data – including the scanning of data of minors. The end result of all this angst has been a steady stream of influencers writing posts calling for changes to Klout and/or [...]