How to Counter Fake Social Media Reviews

116 Shares 116 Shares ×

Fake social media reviews

According to leading business analysts Gartner, as many as 10-15% of social media reviews will be fake by 2014.

Instead of honest customer reviews, praise and feedback on sites like Yelp and Google Places, we’ll have professionally-paid for reviews, either from a company trying to damage a competitor, or raise their own profile by posting multiple glowing reviews.

The report does mention that this will probably be more in the Enterprise market, but what’s to stop smaller businesses hiring interns and specialist agencies to post a review for them?

Mind you, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised at this analysis – as social business continues to take a stronger grip in the mainstream consumer business world, it’s perhaps stranger to ask why these percentages aren’t already in place now (maybe they are).

The good news is, there are steps that can be taken to protect your reputation as a business, as well as stay on the right side of the law when it comes to this newer form of peer and customer recommendation.

Make Social Media Reviews Socially Accountable

On this blog, you’ll see I use the Livefyre comment system. Now, currently I have it set to accept guest comments – however, by a flick of the switch in my admin area, I can change that up and only allow readers to comment after logging in via the likes of Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.

So, when it comes to posting reviews on the likes of Yelp, Google Places and elsewhere, make it the same process.

If you want to leave a review, you have to log in with your Facebook profile, or LinkedIn account. This immediately adds accountability to the process – your name and business is inextricably tied to your review. This makes it far easier to see which is a valid review, and which belongs to a fake.

For instance, let’s say Joe Smith left a crappy review on Yelp for Acme Restaurant, Toronto. The owners of the restaurant can see the review, and then check Joe’s profile on Facebook.

If it’s a valid one, they can then ask Joe to come in with his receipt and they’ll refund the cost of the meal. What, Joe doesn’t have a receipt because he was never there?

Gotcha – that takes us on to the second part of the process.

Build a Digital Ethics Agreement

In the last couple of years, social media has attracted the interest of organizations like the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) in the U.S., the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) in the U.K., and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in Canada.

These organizations are forcing the hands of advertisers and marketers in social media to be above board when it comes to how they’re targeting consumers in the space and, in the case of the Privacy Commissioner, making Facebook change their privacy terms when it comes to sharing information about its users.

So, there are already governing procedures under way and ongoing when it comes to making sure the medium isn’t being used in questionable ways.

The problem is, they’re splintered. The FTC has no real jurisdiction outside of the U.S, and vice versa with the U.K. and Canadian equivalents (although they can work with each other in cross-border cases).

So, technically, a Canadian business could operate around U.S. consumers and (unless picked up) be outwith the legalities of that country. This is where the fake social media reviewers (solo or agency) would win.

However, the Internet is one big global community when it comes to e-commerce. I don’t care if I need to buy a British import CD from Japan to complete my Canadian music collection using Bitcoin – it’s a global market and I’ll use whatever means I need to.

Now, while this may be too simple in actuality over theory, if there was a global Digital Ethics Committee that handled stuff like online reviews, social marketing, etc, and created a governing law that applied to online transactions and subsequent reviews – well wouldn’t that help counter the fake reviews?

The businesses that are caught paying for fake reviews are banned from review sites for X amount of years, with a disclaimer on their Yelp or Places page that advises visitors why there’s no official presence.

By naming and shaming (as well as the obligatory fine and damages paid), consumers can see which companies live by their product and which live by their producing of lies.

As Consumers, We Need Protecting

It may be that these two suggestions are too simple for such a legal minefield. And, despite the Internet’s global reach, the arms of it at a country and cultural level are still too disparate for the simple approach to work.

For now, anyways.

But as we move into a more socially-led and active world, and the stakes continue to rise as to those businesses that will succeed versus those that will flounder, the playground needs to take a stand now.

While social sign-ins may not be the answer (although it’s a lot easier to spot a fake Facebook or LinkedIn account than it is to filter a bogus email), and cross-border integration into a single unit might be a ways off, it’s important we start to think of solutions today.

Otherwise, that tomorrow of 2014 will come a lot quicker than we think, and it’s more than just our reputations at stake – it’s our very future business success.

Join over 11,000 smart subscribers

Get my latest updates delivered straight to your Inbox as soon as they're published (I respect your privacy and will never spam you)

116 Shares Twitter 82 Facebook 0 Google+ 1 Buffer 19 Buffer LinkedIn 14 Email -- Email to a friend 116 Shares ×
About Danny

Danny Brown is Chief Technologist at ArCompany and an award-winning marketer and blogger. His blog is recognized as the #1 marketing blog in the world by HubSpot. Danny is also co-author of Influence Marketing: How to Create, Manage and Measure Brand Influencers in Social Media Marketing.

21 comments
Terillion - Reviews
Terillion - Reviews like.author.displayName 1 Like

Danny, I appreciate the time you took to put this great blog post together. It was a fantastic article - probably the best I've seen on how to combat fake reviews. Thank you.

I'm very familiar with the online review space as I work for a company called Terillion (terillion.com/reviews). I thought you might be interested to hear that we help local businesses get real reviews from their real customers at the point of sale or service. Customers simply write a quick handwritten review on our new iPad kiosk app or simply tap our poster with their NFC enabled phone to write a quick review. After verification, the customers themselves then distribute those reviews and interactions to places like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Yelp, Trip Adviser, our own Terillion directory and more. With this service, fake reviews aren't needed and real reviews are easy to collect and distribute.

Just thought I'd share so you could know there a things being done to stop this plague of fake reviews. :) Again, thanks for the great article. It's very much appreciated.

Jessica Robertson

jrobertson@Terillion.com

http://www.terillion.com/reviews/terillion-blog/

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@Terillion - Reviews Thanks, Jessica, and I'll be sure to check your service out. Anything that can provide balance is always welcome. Be interested in your thoughts to @AliGriffin's comment, and the experience with the car dealership. Do you have "after service" that can help users who had a bad experience like this? Would you request negative reviews are also posted, or is that down to the discretion of the proprietor?

AliGriffin
AliGriffin like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Terillion - ReviewsIt feels to me as though your company is constructed to protect your paying clients instead of educating and informing consumers like a typical "review service" would. I recently had an experience with your service at a car dealership selling restored titles. The company threw in freebies like an extra key FOB if you wrote a positive review using your program. I did this, however after a few weeks had major issues with the car and the customer service. When I went back to write a new, more accurate review your company didn't post my negative review to the site. In my post I did not attack any person or the company, simply told what occurred in my dealings with this company. This problem has cost me countless dollars and their customer support has been unsatisfactory, the owner became verbally abusive over the phone. I posted my review in hopes that other consumers would be more cautious in their purchase. However, I was not able to achieve this goal because it never appeared.


The only reason it would have been dismissed is that it was a negative review that didn't reflect well on the services or customer service of this company. Before my purchase I saw your company's link to reviews on their site and read some reviews from other consumers and thought it was a very good sign that this company had a 100% positive review rating. I later found out that it is only possible to post a review if you have just purchased the car. This means that the majority of the people reviewing are only able to review their initial response with the company, and not how the car actually works. While I see the value for this service in some markets, it does not really make sense in the used car industry. Your evaluation played into my choice to make a purchase. However, in the future it will most likely elicit the opposite response. It seems to me the only companies that would be interested in this type of a service are ones that want to filter out any negative comments. Those aren't really the type of businesses I would want to purchase from. There needs to be a happy medium that is looking out for companies AND consumers, not just companies who are paying for your service.

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb like.author.displayName 1 Like

Whoa Livefyre back LOL

There was a center for media research article from the first half of the year that asked people where they got their advice from and who they trusted for making purchases and restaurants and such. Their social network came in last for influence. I think people already do not trust if the number of reviews is thin whether from reviews online or from peers who are just network contacts vs real friends you trust. 

That said these are great tips and something we all need to think about. Yelp doesn't always remove fraudulent reviews. I have a client that had someone leaving horrible false reviews from newly established accounts that were proven they could not of experienced what they did. And they only removed 1 of them. And there is not customer hotline. So reader beware!

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@HowieG It reminds me of this site, I can't recall the name now, where fake reviews of both people and places could be posted, and the owner wouldn't verify any facts. Instead, it was up to the accused to prove otherwise - and even then, the review wasn't guaranteed to come down.

Wankers.

IanGordon
IanGordon

I agree that this will be become more important to all businesses moving forward.  I am already dealing with it for clients and I can tell you it is a lot harder to deal with unethical, disingenuous reviews when you are a small business without a huge organic community to defend you.  It makes creating that community all the more important but the truth of the matter is that it will incent many to take the easier route and combat the behavior in kind.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@IanGordon Hi mate,

Damn, sorry to hear - although, like you say, the silver lining is the community advocacy built up beforehand to counter it. You can't buy that kind of review, and these are the ones that will stand out.

SocialMMMDiva
SocialMMMDiva

@gurnage Great article! Thanks for sharing...Hope to see you at #DigitalATL12

gurnage
gurnage

@SocialMMMDiva Thanks! I hope to see you as well!

Quozza
Quozza like.author.displayName 1 Like

Great article as usual Danny. I'm not a member of @womma but have always considered their ethics framework http://womma.org/ethics/ to be a high water mark in social media marketing standards. Unfortunately individuals, governments and corporates have much to lose from playing fair (and telling the truth) All contributors are right that the stakes for us all are very high.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Quozza Hi mate, yeah, agree, have a lot of time for WOMMA. Who knows, maybe orgs like that can be the start of the process and be allowed more say when it comes to regulating?

Quozza
Quozza

Agreed and cheers for response. Light touch regulation has been a disaster in many areas (press here in UK - finance in US & UK etc) and whilst I don't believe in Big Governance per-se (self regulation always best) there should be punitive sanctions for businesses who ritually abuse obvious ethical best practice. (suspend SM accounts..!) Would be great if the Gartner insight lead to a key note from a major stateside social media influencer - galvanising other industry leaders into action. Following the 'engage learn improve  engage' process with customers is what makes businesses better at what they do IMO (accountable profitable sustainable etc) - which is ultimately good for us all.

Carmelo
Carmelo like.author.displayName 1 Like

Boy, such an important topic as "life" moves further and further into this more nebulous virtual world. We're less tactile and visual and therefore it calls for more trust in what people say. Yet at the same time, it's almost become easier to say what you want without consequence if you know how to "hide."

There's always been and will probably always be lying and deceit. We just now have so many more ways to spread the deception.  You're right, we need to brainstorm ways to protect ourselves. Education is one but "buyer beware" is a nice phrase but doesn't help a whole lot. What I don't want, however, is a whole lot of ineffective regulation. Self policing and then organizing our own standards and watchdogs makes more sense to me.

Is this what you're getting at, Danny?

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@Carmelo Hi mate,

It'd be great to think that self-policing would solve it, but the bigger issue is usually that only goes so far. For sure, if you have a voice online that many listen to then the message/policing can go wider - but for the majority of us, we still have limited circles.

At least with an official moderation council (or similar) there'd be legal recourse in place as well as user ones, and - combined - they could begin to make the bigger difference.

Cheers, mate!

Carmelo
Carmelo like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Danny Brown Right, that makes sense. Individually we don't have a big enough voice. What I was really getting at we that somehow those with the biggest voices should band together and form this kind of council themselves and not wait for "the government" to react. Perhaps that kind of cooperation is pie in the sky thinking, however? Maybe there's just too much individuality and not enough desire? 

And I do see the need for legal recourse. It would just be nice if our industry had some say in the "law" ... do we have a lobbyist? Danny? You? ;-)  

Lisa Gerber
Lisa Gerber like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

This scares the hell out of me both as a consumer who relies on these reviews and as a marketer who pushes clients to make the  most of them (in an ethical way). Sometimes, and I say sometimes, you can tell fake reviewers simply by clicking on their Yelp profiles, for example, and looking at their other reviews. This doesn't do much, however, when less than savvy consumers don't know to do that and just accept what they see for face value. 

Danny Brown
Danny Brown moderator

@Lisa Gerber And that's where these brands win, Lisa - the "ignorance" (for want of a better word) of the mass market believing something looks official so it must be true...


116 Shares Twitter 82 Facebook 0 Google+ 1 Buffer 19 Buffer LinkedIn 14 Email -- Email to a friend 116 Shares ×